1995
DOI: 10.1109/49.475533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 1.6 Mbps digital-QAM system for DSL transmission

Abstract: An all digital QAM system is studied here for high-speed data transmission on digital subscriber loops. All elements of the system have been fully investigated and their effects on the overall system performance documented. In particular the following issues have been explicitly addressed: utility of an adaptive error-prediction (noise-prediction) filter; equalizer size and convergence; blind equalization; choice of constellation size and center frequency; combined timing/ carrier recovery, and finally the ove… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…By using one FEXT canceller for the FEXT from pair #10, about 6 dB performance improvement (from 27.4 dB to 33.1 dB) has been achieved, with the performance of the receiver then limited by the FEXT from pair #15. Note that the performance improvement of 6 dB corresponds to the FEXT power difference between pair combinations (4, 10) and (4,15). Adding one more FEXT canceller for the FEXT from pair #15 gives further improvement by about 3 dB.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By using one FEXT canceller for the FEXT from pair #10, about 6 dB performance improvement (from 27.4 dB to 33.1 dB) has been achieved, with the performance of the receiver then limited by the FEXT from pair #15. Note that the performance improvement of 6 dB corresponds to the FEXT power difference between pair combinations (4, 10) and (4,15). Adding one more FEXT canceller for the FEXT from pair #15 gives further improvement by about 3 dB.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The signal at the input of the receiver can be written as (4) where and are a desired complex data symbol and a complex FEXT generating signal, respectively. The symbol represents the real part of .…”
Section: Performance Of Transceiver With Fext Canceler and Equalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integration of TCM and precoding is described in detail in [7]. The fundamentals of QAM can be found in [8], while the application of QAM to ADSL is described in [9]. Tomlinson-Harashima Precoding for QAM systems (in a wireless environment) is described in [10], although the author assumes that the channel is reciprocal in nature, an assumption that is not generally possible to make with a DSL system, particularly due to the differences in receiver and transmitter crosstalk environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blind equalization techniques afford channel equalization without loosing the valuable channel capacity. There are three major basic algorithms for blind equalization: the CMA, the reduced constellation algorithm (RCA), and the multi-modulus algorithm (MMA) [1][2][3][4][5][6] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%