2023
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd3f4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 1.3% Distance to M33 from Hubble Space Telescope Cepheid Photometry

Abstract: We present a low-dispersion period–luminosity relation (PL) based on 154 Cepheids in Messier 33 (M33) with Hubble Space Telescope (HST) photometry from the PHATTER survey. Using high-quality ground-based light curves, we recover Cepheid phases and amplitudes for multi-epoch HST data and we perform template fitting to derive intensity-averaged mean magnitudes. HST observations in the SH0ES near-infrared Wesenheit system significantly reduce the effect of crowding relative to ground-based data, as seen in the fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(102 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high quality of the RGB star photometry data (Figure 5(h)) suggested using the TRGB method for distance determination to the M33 galaxy. Actually, even the most accurate distance moduli of M33, which were recently determined based on the TRGB (Lee et al 2022) and Cepheid (Breuval et al 2023) methods, differ by 0.1 mag. The differences of galaxy distances determined using these two methods are comprehensively discussed by Madore & Freedman (2024).…”
Section: Trgb Distance To M33mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The high quality of the RGB star photometry data (Figure 5(h)) suggested using the TRGB method for distance determination to the M33 galaxy. Actually, even the most accurate distance moduli of M33, which were recently determined based on the TRGB (Lee et al 2022) and Cepheid (Breuval et al 2023) methods, differ by 0.1 mag. The differences of galaxy distances determined using these two methods are comprehensively discussed by Madore & Freedman (2024).…”
Section: Trgb Distance To M33mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee et al (2022) determined the true distance modulus of M33 using the I-passband TRGB method to be equal to 24.72 ± 0.02 stat ± 0.07 syst . Breuval et al (2023) determined the true distance modulus of M33 based on the Cepheid method to be equal to 24.622 ± 0.030. Therefore, the true distance modulus derived in the present study (24.63) falls between these values and is closer to the result based on Cepheids.…”
Section: Trgb Distance To M33mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation