ESSCIRC Conference 2016: 42nd European Solid-State Circuits Conference 2016
DOI: 10.1109/esscirc.2016.7598334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 0.36V 128Kb 6T SRAM with energy-efficient dynamic body-biasing and output data prediction in 28nm FDSOI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The array standby power (cell leakage) of this work is the lowest. When comparing [15] to [10], the E/access is double for a memory capacity that is twice as large. Hence, to take memory capacity into account, the E/bitcell metric is introduced, which shows similar performance in both implementations as well as [12].…”
Section: Performance Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The array standby power (cell leakage) of this work is the lowest. When comparing [15] to [10], the E/access is double for a memory capacity that is twice as large. Hence, to take memory capacity into account, the E/bitcell metric is introduced, which shows similar performance in both implementations as well as [12].…”
Section: Performance Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, in future work, data-dependent memory architectures e.g. 8T SRAMs, [23], [24] can be used to store and access the inputs/outputs. [23], [24] take advantage of data properties to significantly reduce memoryaccess energy, which would be highly useful here.…”
Section: Metricmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8T SRAMs, [23], [24] can be used to store and access the inputs/outputs. [23], [24] take advantage of data properties to significantly reduce memoryaccess energy, which would be highly useful here. Compared to [5], [9], we achieve > 27× improvement in energy-efficiency, due to the massively parallel in-memory analog computations.…”
Section: Metricmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DRAM vs SRAM). The cell size of a typical SRAM cell in a state of the art 28 nm technology is in the order of 200F 2 [49][50][51][52]. For the recent 14 and 16 nm technology nodes with more complicated transistor layouts such as tri-gate or FinFET, the cell sizes are even higher [49,53,54].…”
Section: Static and Dynamic Random Access Memory (Sram/dram)mentioning
confidence: 99%