A 0.31THz CMOS Uniform Circular Antenna Array Enabling Generation/Detection of Waves with Orbital-Angular Momentum

Khan, Muhammad Ibrahim Wasiq; Woo, Jongchan; Yi, Xiang; Ibrahim, Mohamed I.; Yazicigil, Rabia Tugce; Chandrakasan, Anantha P.; Han, Ruonan

doi:10.1109/rfic51843.2021.9490402

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This includes exploiting a system-level approach with cross-layer optimization extending from the networking layer through encryption and authentication down to the physical layer. Recent works address some physical-layer threat models and have demonstrated countermeasures in integrated hardware for energy-constrained wireless systems [4]- [6], [8], [9], [20], [36]- [40]. However, it is difficult to compare those works and determine which one to use based on an application since there is no single security metric to be used.…”

Section: What Is Next For Physical-layer Security?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Physical-Layer Security for Energy-Constrained Integrated Systems: Challenges and Design Perspectives

Yasar,

Yazicigil

2023

IEEE Open J. Solid-State Circuits Soc.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The expanding scale and growing connectivity of Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices coincide with the emergence of next-generation communication technologies. These devices serve various purposes, including communication, manufacturing, biomedical and environmental monitoring. However, the increasing number of connected devices raises concerns about data security and integrity. Previous research has highlighted the severe consequences of security inadequacies, shown by incidents involving biomedical devices [1]-[3] as an example. Nevertheless, due to resource constraints like power, hardware complexity, and latency, digital cryptography is not universally suitable for these devices [4]- [6]. An alternative is embedding physicallayer security (PLS) measures. Diverse countermeasures within the physical layer have been explored, including wireless network security [4]-[9] and resistance against side-channel attacks (SCA) [10]-[12]. This study reviews threat modeling for physical-layer security, underlining its significance and emphasizing its similarities and distinctions from conventional security threat models. We then investigate two commonly employed adversarial techniques: eavesdropping and SCAs. This exploration involves an investigation of distinct security approaches, alongside an evaluation of their associated threat models and trade-offs. While physical-layer security techniques address the before-mentioned resource and latency constraints, they do not universally apply to all devices. Ultra-low-power or ultra-low-latency devices might necessitate balancing security with performance. However, the absence of a standardized framework in the realm of physical-layer security poses challenges for designers in comparing and selecting the most fitting approach. To conclude, this work provides suggestions for addressing current gaps and enhancing the field of physicallayer security.

show abstract