2014
DOI: 10.6002/ect.2013.0038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: Combined heart-kidney transplant has become an alternative for heart transplant candidates with significant chronic kidney disease. However, it is not clear which patients will benefit most from such intervention, and in whom cardiac transplant alone will be sufficient to restore adequate renal function. We report the case of a man with ischemic cardiomyopathy and chronic kidney disease who was wait-listed for heart-kidney transplant after acute decompensated heart failure and renal failure requiring hemodialy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients with incident CKD after HT were older (patients without incident CKD vs. patients with incident CKD: 45 (37–58) vs. 49 (53–61), p = 0.009) and more frequently males (65.4% vs. 76.0%, p = 0.039), with required mechanical ventilation (20.1% vs. 33.7%, p = 0.003), ECMO (19.5% vs. 28.8, p = 0.035), RRT (16.2% vs. 22.9%, p = 0.018), and inotropes or vasopressors (42.9 vs. 30.8%, p = 0.023) more frequently than those without incident CKD ( Supplementary Material, Table S2 ). ICU length of stay (7 [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ] vs. 10 [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ], p < 0.001) was longer, but hospital length of stay (60 (36–83] vs. 48 (33–73), p = 0.039) was shorter in patients with incident CKD than in those without incident CKD.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Patients with incident CKD after HT were older (patients without incident CKD vs. patients with incident CKD: 45 (37–58) vs. 49 (53–61), p = 0.009) and more frequently males (65.4% vs. 76.0%, p = 0.039), with required mechanical ventilation (20.1% vs. 33.7%, p = 0.003), ECMO (19.5% vs. 28.8, p = 0.035), RRT (16.2% vs. 22.9%, p = 0.018), and inotropes or vasopressors (42.9 vs. 30.8%, p = 0.023) more frequently than those without incident CKD ( Supplementary Material, Table S2 ). ICU length of stay (7 [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ] vs. 10 [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ], p < 0.001) was longer, but hospital length of stay (60 (36–83] vs. 48 (33–73), p = 0.039) was shorter in patients with incident CKD than in those without incident CKD.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CRS is a leading cause of renal dysfunction in patients with heart failure. Acute CRS is known to be reversible [ 6 , 7 ]; however, there have been conflicting results regarding the clinical impact of pre-HT renal dysfunction on the overall prognosis of HT [ 3 , 8 , 9 , 10 ]. Given the organ shortage and the clinical difficulty of determining the reversibility of renal dysfunction in patients with advanced renal dysfunction being considered for HKT, it is imperative to identify predictive factors of renal outcome after HT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%