2002
DOI: 10.1186/gb-2002-3-3-reviews1005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: The completed Arabidopsis genome seems to be of limited value as a model for maize genomics. In addition to the expansion of repetitive sequences in maize and the lack of genomic micro-colinearity, maize-specific or highly-diverged proteins contribute to a predicted maize proteome of about 50,000 proteins, twice the size of that of Arabidopsis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the amplitudes of major lipids - MGDG, DGDG, and PC were much lower in Arabidopsis compared to the three grasses. These results suggest the conservation of chilling tolerance-induced changes in lipid content and composition and rhythmic patterns of lipids across grasses and Arabidopsis despite 150 million years of divergence between monocots and eudicots (41).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, the amplitudes of major lipids - MGDG, DGDG, and PC were much lower in Arabidopsis compared to the three grasses. These results suggest the conservation of chilling tolerance-induced changes in lipid content and composition and rhythmic patterns of lipids across grasses and Arabidopsis despite 150 million years of divergence between monocots and eudicots (41).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Maize provides a valuable plant complement to Arabidopsis. Both maize, a monocot, and Arabidopsis, a eudicot, have made important contributions to biology, yet they have quite different body plans, seed development pathways, genome sizes and gene expression profiles, having diverged 200 MYA (Brendel et al, 2002;Conklin et al, 2018;Dukowic-Schulze et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2012;Zeng et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the remarkable functional consequences of centromeric chromatin asymmetry, the causes of CenH3 rapid evolution remain unknown. The timescale of adaptive CenH3 evolution, detected by comparing two Arabidopsis species only 5 million years diverged (105), is much shorter than the divergence time between A. thaliana and Z. mays (>150 million years) (11). A hybrid system that captures the shorter timescale, like the asymmetrical centromeres from the M. musculus system described above, could provide the opportunity to test the hypothesis that rapidly oscillating centromere size or changes to the sequence itself imposes evolutionary pressure on CenH3 to alter its affinity.…”
Section: Centromere and Kinetochore Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 91%