2000
DOI: 10.1023/a:1001886521449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: The sexual age preferences of 192 adults (equal groups of heterosexual men, heterosexual women, homosexual men, and homosexual women) were examined. Participants rated the sexual attractiveness of pictures of 15 male and 15 female faces arranged into five apparent average age categories ranging from 18 to 60 years. It was predicted that homosexual and heterosexual men would prefer younger partners of their preferred sex than would homosexual and heterosexual women and that age preference would not vary with pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The female students (M = 23.7, SD = 5.3 years) were slightly younger than the male students (M = 25.3, SD = 3.9 years). Most likely, the small-to-moderate difference (effect size: d = .35) is not relevant given the observation of Silverthorne and Quinsey (2000) that attractiveness ratings of stimulus age categories were not correlated with participants' age.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The female students (M = 23.7, SD = 5.3 years) were slightly younger than the male students (M = 25.3, SD = 3.9 years). Most likely, the small-to-moderate difference (effect size: d = .35) is not relevant given the observation of Silverthorne and Quinsey (2000) that attractiveness ratings of stimulus age categories were not correlated with participants' age.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Furthermore, images with lower waist-to-hip ratios were looked at more intently -a finding that Suschinsky et al interpreted in terms of the waist-tohip ratio as an indication of reproductive fitness. Silverthorne and Quinsey (2000) assessed the age preferences of hetero-and homosexual males and females, using 30 pictures of human faces that ranged between about 18 and 60 years of age. Mean age of the participants was 33 years.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies report that homosexual men show a male-typical mating psychology, including an interest in casual sex and sexually explicit visual material [42], as well as showing male-typical mate retention behavior [43]. Similar to heterosexual men, homosexual men value physical attractiveness in their potential partners more than heterosexual women [44], and they prefer potential partners who are younger than themselves [45], [46]. Thus, it seems that the effect of gender on variation in partner preference is stronger than the effect of sexual orientation [47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, our results show a general lack of assortativity by age in the flirt network. Both hetero- and homosexual men have similar age preferences for younger sex partners [15]. Though, partner age preferences have been shown to vary importantly depending on if a person is seeking in real life (IRL) long-term or short-term relationship: men seeking sexual contacts prefer significantly wider age range of partners compared to men looking for a steady partner [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%