2006
DOI: 10.1186/gb-2006-7-4-212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: The majority of disease resistance genes in plants encode nucleotide-binding site leucine-rich repeat (NBS-LRR) proteins. This large family is encoded by hundreds of diverse genes per genome and can be subdivided into the functionally distinct TIR-domain-containing (TNL) and CC-domain-containing (CNL) subfamilies. Their precise role in recognition is unknown; however, they are thought to monitor the status of plant proteins that are targeted by pathogen effectors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
337
0
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 812 publications
(354 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
11
337
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimates of selection intensity by K a /K s ranged from 0.580 to 0.691, indicating that a purifying selection was acted on in the Rrs2 region. This finding is consistent with the selection pattern observed for NBS regions of other R genes (McHale et al 2006;Ribas et al 2011).…”
Section: Evolution In the Rrs2 Regionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The estimates of selection intensity by K a /K s ranged from 0.580 to 0.691, indicating that a purifying selection was acted on in the Rrs2 region. This finding is consistent with the selection pattern observed for NBS regions of other R genes (McHale et al 2006;Ribas et al 2011).…”
Section: Evolution In the Rrs2 Regionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…NBS-LRR proteins are capable of recognizing a wide variety of pathogens and initiate a hypersensitive response (HR), resulting in cell death. The NBS-LRR proteins are divided in two major groups, involved in downstream specificity and signaling regulation [80], both of them showing high levels of expression in the Pp04. The behavior of NBS-LRR proteins through the different time point comparisons pointed out one more difference between the early and the late phase of response and a possible reason why the early response is not effective.…”
Section: Late Responses To Infection Seem To Be Involved In the Mitigmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PTI is elicited by highly conserved microbe-associated molecular pattern molecules (MAMPs), such as bacterial flagellin or fungal chitin. ETI is generally elicited by pathogen-encoded virulence effectors that are recognized directly or indirectly by cytoplasmic nucleotide-binding site–leucine-rich repeat (NBS-LRR) receptors, referred to generically as Nod-like receptors or NLRs (Belkhadir et al, 2004; McHale et al, 2006; Nimchuk et al, 2003). Biochemical, pharmacological, and genetic approaches have been used to implicate both nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidases and apoplastic peroxidases as the source of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Bindschedler et al, 2006; Bolwell et al, 2002; Grant et al, 2000; Torres et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%