2015
DOI: 10.4194/1303-2712-v15_3_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: This study assessed bycatch composition and some factors affected assemblage from blue swimming crab fisheries in semi-enclosed Pattani Bay and offshore area, the Gulf of Thailand. Samples were collected from May 2013 to September 2014 by using crab gill net. One hundred seventy four of bycatches were found within proportion of 52.2% in the bay and 49.5% from offshore. Moreover, discarded species from the bay and offshore were 26.3% and 47.1%, respectively. The most dominant species in the bay was horse shoe c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The bycatch crustacean diversity index value of crab trap fisheries obtained was higher than that found in Kolono Bay, 0.471-0.648 (Hamid & Kamri, 2021), while the value of the crab gillnet fisheries obtained was higher the 0.812-0.893 in Lasongko Bay (Hamid & Wardiatno, 2018). Furthermore, the combined value of the crab gillnet fisheries obtained was lower than the 2.84-3.47 bycatch value in the Bay and Coast Pattani, Thailand (Fazrul et al, 2015). The differences in ecological index values are due to variation in the number of species and the distribution of each species of fish and crustacean bycatch between the types of fishing gear in crab fisheries, and differences in fishing intensity (Brower et al, 1990;Hamid et al, 2020).…”
Section: Ecological Status Of Bycatchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bycatch crustacean diversity index value of crab trap fisheries obtained was higher than that found in Kolono Bay, 0.471-0.648 (Hamid & Kamri, 2021), while the value of the crab gillnet fisheries obtained was higher the 0.812-0.893 in Lasongko Bay (Hamid & Wardiatno, 2018). Furthermore, the combined value of the crab gillnet fisheries obtained was lower than the 2.84-3.47 bycatch value in the Bay and Coast Pattani, Thailand (Fazrul et al, 2015). The differences in ecological index values are due to variation in the number of species and the distribution of each species of fish and crustacean bycatch between the types of fishing gear in crab fisheries, and differences in fishing intensity (Brower et al, 1990;Hamid et al, 2020).…”
Section: Ecological Status Of Bycatchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Penelitian tentang krustasea bycatch perikanan rajungan telah dilakukan oleh beberapa peneliti sebelumnya, diantaranya adalah Kumar et al (2013) di pantai Thoothukudi, India, Fazrul et al (2015) di Berdasarkan penelitian tersebut menunjukkan bahwa adanya variasi keragaman krustasea bycatch perikanan rajungan antar lokasi periaran. Selain itu, dari sejumlah penelitian tersebut belum ada yang mengkaji keragaman krustasea bycatch perikanan rajungan berdasarkan periode bulan, sehingga hal ini menjadi kajian dalam peneitian ini.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Jumlah total jenis krustasea bycatch perikanan rajungan yang diperoleh padapenelitian ini sebanyak 20 jenis, dan ini identik dengan dilaporkan di Teluk Kolono (Hamid &Kamri 2021). Jumlah jenis krustasea bycatch yang ditemukan pada penelitian ini lebih rendah dari yang dilaporkan oleh Pillai et al (2014), Fazrul et al(2015) ). Keragamana jenis krustasea bycatch perikanan rajungan bervariasi antara lokasi perairan (Tabel 6), dan hal ini perkaitan dengan perbedaan kondisi habitat perairan, jenis alat tangkap yang digunakan, dan periode waktu penelitian (Hamid et al 2020).…”
Section: Pembahasanunclassified
See 2 more Smart Citations