1999
DOI: 10.1023/a:1009806923447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our case, since we work in T x × R y rather than in T × T, the mean value has to satisfy the zero mass constraint (1.4), otherwise we do not have decay to zero as |y| → ∞. For more about the zero mass constraint see also [15,30,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our case, since we work in T x × R y rather than in T × T, the mean value has to satisfy the zero mass constraint (1.4), otherwise we do not have decay to zero as |y| → ∞. For more about the zero mass constraint see also [15,30,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [62], precise asymptotics are given for KP-II in the case of small data with eight derivatives in L 1 ∩ L 2 . In the KP-I case, a similar description is established for the case of small data in the Schwartz class [59]. See [23,24] for a complete description of the state of art via the use of rigorous ISTs.…”
Section: Theorem 11 (Central Decay)mentioning
confidence: 96%