2001
DOI: 10.1023/a:1011856522161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We do not describe the whole procedure again, but highlight that the results are nondimensional values of KF(x,y) at locations x,y (referred to a Cartesian plane). The KF(x,y) data are then converted into pseudo-intensities by the semi-empirical by a data-fitting function (2) in Sirovich et al (2001) We adopt the convention of the positive direction of the strike ranging from 0° to 360°, with the fault plane dipping to the right. According to this, rake angles ranging between 1° to 179° indicate faults with inverse (compressive) components.…”
Section: Model Kfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not describe the whole procedure again, but highlight that the results are nondimensional values of KF(x,y) at locations x,y (referred to a Cartesian plane). The KF(x,y) data are then converted into pseudo-intensities by the semi-empirical by a data-fitting function (2) in Sirovich et al (2001) We adopt the convention of the positive direction of the strike ranging from 0° to 360°, with the fault plane dipping to the right. According to this, rake angles ranging between 1° to 179° indicate faults with inverse (compressive) components.…”
Section: Model Kfmentioning
confidence: 99%