Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The indoor f p varies from 9.3 to 16.9%, with typical values of 10.9 and 12.8% for urban and rural indoor environments, respectively. The f p values in indoor environments are quite similar to the results of Canoba's measurements in dwellings without additional aerosol sources in Argentina (f p : 9%-29%) [21] and also Tokonami's continuous measurement results in dwellings with air circulating systems in Japan (f p : 11%) [22], a little larger than Reineking's measurement results (f p : 9%) in Germany [23] and El-Hussein's results for indoor air in the cellar of the Physics Department of El-Minia University, Egypt (f p : 6 ± 0.5%) [24] as well as Chen's survey results in 14 dwellings in Kaohsiung, Taiwan (f p average 5.5%, from 2.7 to 13.1%) [25], but much smaller than Huet's 1-year measurement in an old dwelling situated in Brittany (f p average 31%, from 8 to 67%) [26]. These differences are mainly a result of differing environmental factors, especially the aerosol concentration and ventilation rate.…”
Section: Field Measurement Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The indoor f p varies from 9.3 to 16.9%, with typical values of 10.9 and 12.8% for urban and rural indoor environments, respectively. The f p values in indoor environments are quite similar to the results of Canoba's measurements in dwellings without additional aerosol sources in Argentina (f p : 9%-29%) [21] and also Tokonami's continuous measurement results in dwellings with air circulating systems in Japan (f p : 11%) [22], a little larger than Reineking's measurement results (f p : 9%) in Germany [23] and El-Hussein's results for indoor air in the cellar of the Physics Department of El-Minia University, Egypt (f p : 6 ± 0.5%) [24] as well as Chen's survey results in 14 dwellings in Kaohsiung, Taiwan (f p average 5.5%, from 2.7 to 13.1%) [25], but much smaller than Huet's 1-year measurement in an old dwelling situated in Brittany (f p average 31%, from 8 to 67%) [26]. These differences are mainly a result of differing environmental factors, especially the aerosol concentration and ventilation rate.…”
Section: Field Measurement Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The average of f p indoors is 8.7%, and the minimum is 6.3% which appears in June, while the maximum is 12.5% which appears in February. The average value is quite similar to Reineking's measurement results ( f p : 9%) in Germany [13], a little larger than El-Hussein's results in the cellar of the Physics Department of El-Minia University, Egypt ( f p : 6 ± 0.5%) [13] and Chen's survey results in 14 dwellings in Kaohsiung, Taiwan ( f p average 5.5%, from 2.7 to 13.1%) [14], a little smaller than Canoba's measurements in Argentina (f p : 9%-29%) [15] and Tokonami's results with air circulating systems in Japan ( f p : 11%) [16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…UNSCEAR reports provide a synopsis of the radon survey in many countries around the world [2,4]. In African countries, radon was measured in different countries Ethiopia [38], Uganda, Kenya [39], Ghana [40] and Latin American countries [41]. On the other hand, radon measurement was conducted in some Arab countries through under research program supported by the Arab Atomic Energy Agency [42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%