2002
DOI: 10.1023/a:1022038816555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In E1 the total number of EAS events was 53 907 and the duration of the experiment was 501 460 s. So the mean event rate of the first experiment was 0.1075 events per second. The distribution of the time between successive events is in good agreement with an exponential function, indicating that the event sampling is completely random (Bahmanabadi et al 2003). In E2 the total number of events was 173 765 and the duration of the second experiment was 2 902 857 s, so its mean event rate was 0.05986 events per seconds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In E1 the total number of EAS events was 53 907 and the duration of the experiment was 501 460 s. So the mean event rate of the first experiment was 0.1075 events per second. The distribution of the time between successive events is in good agreement with an exponential function, indicating that the event sampling is completely random (Bahmanabadi et al 2003). In E2 the total number of events was 173 765 and the duration of the second experiment was 2 902 857 s, so its mean event rate was 0.05986 events per seconds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The error due to the first two factors was ∆t 2 ns (Bahmanabadi et al 2002). The error in the logged time of each EAS event was ∆T = 0.07 s which is due to the recording rate and the synchronizing of the computer.…”
Section: Error Estimation Of Investigated Sources In Galactic Coordinmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, if the trigger efficiency of an array is sensitive to the shower lateral extension, the GeoMF can change the acquisition rate as a function of the zenith and azimuth angles. An azimuthal modulation was observed at the Yakutsk array for EAS with energies above 50 PeV [3] and at the ALBORZ Observatory for energies above 100 TeV [4]. The GeoMF effect has been observed in radio experiments [5] and studied to improve the EAS simulation [6], to correct the pointing ofCerenkov telescopes [7], and to discriminate the primary mass [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The study of the GeoMF effect on the shower development are expected to be performed at higher energies, in fact an azimuthal modulation was already observed not only at the Yakutsk array for EAS with energies above 50 PeV [16] and at the ALBORZ Observatory for energies above 100 TeV [17], but also in radio experiments [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%