2003
DOI: 10.1023/a:1026028928003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: In addition to locating chromosomal positions of quantitative trait loci (QTL), estimating the sizes of identified QTL is also an important component in QTL mapping. The size of a QTL is usually measured by the proportion of the phenotypic variance contributed by the QTL. However, the genetic variance may be overestimated in a small line crossing experiment. In this study, we investigate this bias and develop a simple method to correct the bias. The bias correction, however, requires the error of the estimated… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A limited population size for identifying QTLs affects the accuracy of determining QTL locations and estimating QTL effects and, consequently, overestimates the phenotypic variances associated with QTLs [39]–[41]. To correct at least the small part of the overestimation due to sampling error, we applied the correction described in Montoya et al [27], as proposed by Luo et al [42] and Xu [43]. They suggest to multiply the explained variance by 1−1/(2*Ln(10)*LOD).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A limited population size for identifying QTLs affects the accuracy of determining QTL locations and estimating QTL effects and, consequently, overestimates the phenotypic variances associated with QTLs [39]–[41]. To correct at least the small part of the overestimation due to sampling error, we applied the correction described in Montoya et al [27], as proposed by Luo et al [42] and Xu [43]. They suggest to multiply the explained variance by 1−1/(2*Ln(10)*LOD).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A bias corrected estimate, denoted , can be derived using standard dispersion statistics: where is the estimated variance of γ a (the squared standard error of ), is the estimated variance of γ d and s ad is the sampling co-variance. This statistical issue has been addressed for a single locus [ 19 ], and we here generalize bias-correction for genetic variance predictions when there are interactions among loci. We extend the logic of Eq 5 to all eight genetic effect estimates associated with each QTL pair (see “ Linear model for estimation of genetic effects ” section above).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard equations used to calculate V A from genetic effects [ 11 ] assume that effects are estimated without error. Estimation error in genetic effects is often substantial even with large sample sizes, and failing to account for this error will result in an upward bias in variance predictions [ 19 ]. This is because genetic effects are squared and different effects are multiplied together when variances are calculated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…whereq is the maximum-likelihood estimate (MLE) for allele frequency,â is the MLE for the additive effect, and V P is the phenotypic variance. This estimated heritability is inflated by estimation error ofâ (Luo, Mao, & Xu, 2003;.…”
Section: Msg On Pcr Amplified Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%