Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2003
DOI: 10.1023/a:1023914805034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Al treatment increased the Al NaOH ∼ 25 pool, and consequently, changed the sorption characteristics of Jordán sediments from those of a nonacidified lake such as Římov Reservoir (Figure A) to those typical of an acidified lake such as Plešné Lake (Figure B) and significantly reduced the amount of P extractable under anoxic conditions. Similar results were obtained in other laboratory experiments ( , ) and during lake restoration treatments with Al ( , ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The Al treatment increased the Al NaOH ∼ 25 pool, and consequently, changed the sorption characteristics of Jordán sediments from those of a nonacidified lake such as Římov Reservoir (Figure A) to those typical of an acidified lake such as Plešné Lake (Figure B) and significantly reduced the amount of P extractable under anoxic conditions. Similar results were obtained in other laboratory experiments ( , ) and during lake restoration treatments with Al ( , ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Under alkaline conditions, the adsorption of phosphorus by LMB was hindered (Figure ). At the same time, phosphorus bound to metal oxides such as iron and aluminum oxides can be released from the sediment into water under alkaline conditions. , In addition, a significant negative effect of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) on the sequestration of phosphorus by LMB also has been previously reported. ,, Therefore, one would expect a much higher DIP concentration under light conditions in view of the pH and DOC concentration. Nevertheless, our results show that the DIP concentration was much lower under light conditions for sediment when compared to that observed under dark conditions (Table ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in addition to the damage to the evenly distributed capping layer, the disturbance can also cause the sediment and LMB to be resuspended into the photic layer of the overlying water, where enough light is present for photosynthesis to take place so that sunlight and carbon dioxide gas are converted into organic carbon (in phytoplankton) and oxygen gas. Due to the photosynthesis activity of algae, the environment in the photic layer differs from the lake bed; that is, the former has a generally high pH (it can exceed pH 10 during major phytoplankton blooms in poorly buffered systems), ,, high dissolved organic carbon (DOC), high dissolved oxygen (DO), and algae present. Although phosphorus-inactivating agents (PIAs), including LMB, are increasingly being applied and extensively investigated to control internal phosphorus loading in lakes, little is known about how PIA-amended sediment behaves in terms of phosphorus immobilization and release when it is resuspended into the photic layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Influxes of phosphorus compounds originating in bottom sediments may in fact account for up to 99% of the content of P in shallow reservoirs. This means that the intensity and duration of the internal process of alimentation with phosphorus is significant for water quality [18,46]. In the case of the Reservoir studied, the most intensive alimentation of this kind is likely to occur near the inflow (at station M1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%