2001
DOI: 10.1023/a:1011815325503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We considered butterfly species and sex as fixed effects, the log-transformed distance from the smelter (a proxy of pollution load: Kozlov et al [9]) as a covariate, and the site as a random effect. Following the practice commonly accepted in observational studies [28][29][30], we preferred to use the distance from the polluter rather than the concentration of one of the main pollutants (nickel or copper) in plant foliage or in a litter. This was done to avoid misinterpretation of our results, because we do not know which of the pollution-related factors (which all change with the distance from the smelter in a coordinated manner) may have affected the butterflies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We considered butterfly species and sex as fixed effects, the log-transformed distance from the smelter (a proxy of pollution load: Kozlov et al [9]) as a covariate, and the site as a random effect. Following the practice commonly accepted in observational studies [28][29][30], we preferred to use the distance from the polluter rather than the concentration of one of the main pollutants (nickel or copper) in plant foliage or in a litter. This was done to avoid misinterpretation of our results, because we do not know which of the pollution-related factors (which all change with the distance from the smelter in a coordinated manner) may have affected the butterflies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heteroptera are affected by the amount of resources available ('consumer rarity hypothesis ' Siemann 1998) as well as by the diversity of plant species ('specialisation hypothesis': DeAngelis 1994; Srivastava and Lawton 1998). The latter conclusion is also supported by the study of Brändle et al (2001) on Heteroptera and plant diversity in pine forests along a pollution gradient. There, however, abundance of Heteroptera was negatively correlated with plant species density.…”
Section: Effect Of Site Historymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Fountain and Hopkin (2004a) confirmed the same pattern for Collembola communities in polluted areas. One explanation of this fairly consistent pattern might be that pollutant-caused changes in environmental conditions can lead to the emergence of new niches for new species, as described in detail in work on sulphur dioxide and Heteroptera (Brändle et al 2001, 2006): higher SO 2 deposition had altered the soil conditions, making it possible for new species of plants to appear in the area. In turn, the new plant species provided a food source for new monophagous species of Heteroptera , and new herbivore arthropods attracted new narrowly specialized arthropod predators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%