2002
DOI: 10.1023/a:1016562228619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…   (11) The radial distribution of the heat release is represented on figure 1 [3]. It has the same form as the radial distribution of 239 Pu in the fuel pellet [4,5], and does not depend on burnup.…”
Section: Rim B  mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…   (11) The radial distribution of the heat release is represented on figure 1 [3]. It has the same form as the radial distribution of 239 Pu in the fuel pellet [4,5], and does not depend on burnup.…”
Section: Rim B  mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original TUBRNP [6] model for power and burn-up calculations included in the TRAN-SURANUS fuel performance code [7], and later also in other codes like FRAPCON3 [8], extended the RADAR model by including higher Pu isotopes, and modifying the radial shape function that accounts for resonance absorption by 238 U. TUBRNP was originally validated for UO 2 fuel in light-water reactors (LWRs) with experimental data from fuel with burn-up values between 35 and 64 MWd/kgHM. Later on, the RAPID model [9] was developed for the COSMOS code [10][11][12], PLUTON [13] was developed for the FEMAXI code [14], while a specific burn-up model for the RTOP code [15] was developed for fuel rods in Russian-type WWER reactors. RAPID was validated purely on the basis of profiles calculated by HELIOS up to 150 MWd/kgHM, while the others were validated against experimental data up to 83 MWd/kgHM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%