To better understand the molecular basis for some of the unique mechanical properties of tonic smooth muscle, we use a laser trap to assay the mechanochemistry of single smooth muscle heavy meromyosin molecules lacking a seven-amino acid insert in the nucleotide binding loop (minus insert). We measured a second-order ATP-induced actin dissociation rate, k T , of 2. , and an ADP affinity, K D , of 3.2 M, which is more than 100-fold greater than that measured for skeletal muscle myosin. By performing in vitro motility studies under nearly identical conditions, we show that the relatively slow actin velocity generated by minus-insert heavy meromyosin is significantly influenced, but not limited, by k ؊D . Our results support a model in which two separate intermediate steps in the actin-myosin catalyzed ATP hydrolysis reaction are energetically coupled through mechanical interactions, and we discuss this model in the context of the ability of tonic muscle to maintain high forces at low energetic cost (latch).Muscle shortening and force generation result from actinmyosin binding events that are coupled to the actin-myosin catalyzed ATP hydrolysis reaction illustrated in Fig. 1. Upon binding to an actin filament (A) and releasing inorganic phosphate (P i ), myosin undergoes a large and discrete rotation of its lever-like light chain domain, which is capable of generating both motion and force (1-5). With the subsequent release of ADP (at the rate k ϪD ) an additional rotation of the light chain domain of myosin has been observed in smooth muscle myosin (6, 7), but unlike the work generating rotation associated with actin binding/P i release, the rotation associated with ADP release is thought to be a strain-sensing biochemical step (8 -10). Following the release of ADP, ATP binding induces the detachment of myosin from the actin filament (at the rate k T ), after which ATP is hydrolyzed.Muscles differ significantly in their shortening speeds and force-generating capacities. For instance, smooth muscle produces a greater average force per myosin and slower speeds of shortening than skeletal muscle (11). To a large extent these mechanical differences are caused by kinetic differences among the different myosin isoforms that exist within different muscle types (12, 13). For example, phasic and tonic smooth muscle (found in the intestine and aorta respectively) express two myosin heavy chain isoforms that differ by a seven-amino acid insert in a surface loop spanning their nucleotide binding pocket (14 -16). Phasic smooth muscle contains primarily the plus-insert myosin, whereas tonic smooth muscle contains primarily the minus-insert myosin. In addition, two essential light chain isoforms are coordinately expressed with the heavy chain isoforms. The acidic isoform (LC 17a ) is coexpressed with the plus-insert heavy chain whereas the basic isoform (LC 17b ) coexpresses with the minus-insert heavy chain (17-19). Based on in vitro motility studies, the presence or absence of the sevenamino acid insert in the heavy chain is t...