1998
DOI: 10.1023/a:1008612905619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an answer to a question raised by H. Herrlich, an internal description of the epireflector from TOP onto TOP 2 was given by V. Kannan in [5], making use of a transfinite construction. We will now derive an explicit description for the epireflector from AP onto AP 2 , along the same lines as was done for the T 1 -case in the section above.…”
Section: A(y)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As an answer to a question raised by H. Herrlich, an internal description of the epireflector from TOP onto TOP 2 was given by V. Kannan in [5], making use of a transfinite construction. We will now derive an explicit description for the epireflector from AP onto AP 2 , along the same lines as was done for the T 1 -case in the section above.…”
Section: A(y)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [11], three different suggestions for regularity were proposed, and in [5], it was motivated that the strongest one of them is the correct notion of regularity in the construct AP. We simply recall this definition for the sake of completeness.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was further studied by B. Banaschewski, R. Lowen and C. Van Olmen [1] and has interesting applications in the setting of extensions of contractions and function spaces, see Jäger [12] and Colebunders, Mynard, Troth [9]. A characterization of regularity generalizing (1.1) to the setting of approach spaces, which we recall in (5.1), was presented by Brock and Kent [4]. It is based on the limit operator acting on filters and on some diagonal operation on selected filters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…An approach space is called regular if it satisfies one and hence both conditions. Brock and Kent [4] have shown that regularity of an approach space is equivalent to the following conditions in terms of selections, one is a version based on filters, the other uses only ultrafilters. If A is a set, ψ : A → X, σ : A → F p X, and G ∈ F p A, then 5.2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%