2000
DOI: 10.1023/a:1007577916868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An absolute value of the uncertainty is given with the standard deviation (Fig. 5, bottom left), calculated according to Yamamoto (2000). It depends on the measured precipitation values.…”
Section: Uncertainty Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An absolute value of the uncertainty is given with the standard deviation (Fig. 5, bottom left), calculated according to Yamamoto (2000). It depends on the measured precipitation values.…”
Section: Uncertainty Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, a number of variants of kriging are in general use, and these are simple kriging, ordinary kriging (OK), universal kriging, block kriging, cokriging, and disjunctive kriging. Among the various forms of kriging, OK has been used widely as a reliable estimation method (Yamamoto 2000). Kriging is distinguished from IDW and other interpolation methods by taking into consideration the variance of estimated parameters (Buttner et al 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OK is most commonly adopted for environmental studies (Poon et al 2000;Kravchenko and Bullock 1999;Lin et al 2001;Tranchant and Vincent 2000;Gringarten and Deutsch 2001). A more detailed explanation of the kriging method is given by Stein (1999), Yamamoto (2000), Gringarten and Deutsch (2001), Mcgrath and Zhang (2003), and Cressie (1990). Zimmerman et al (1999) compared the accuracy of OK, Universal Kriging, and IDW methods based on an analysis of synthetic data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative approach yielding more reliable errors (Yamamoto, 2000) was not implemented due to the enormous increase in computing time. Thus, the determination of accurate uncertainty estimates remains an issue for data sets of high resolution in space and time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kriging variance is known to lack precision on a local scale, since local variation of the data is not considered in the estimation of uncertainty. More sophisticated approaches were suggested by Deutsch and Journel (1998) and Yamamoto (2000). However, due to the enormous increase in computing time, as observed in tests using the approach by Yamamoto (2000), we rely on the easily available kriging variance in this work.…”
Section: Uncertainties Of Interpolationmentioning
confidence: 99%