1998
DOI: 10.1023/a:1022325805088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, although the quantitative literature has begun to uncover associations between interpersonal factors and couple-level outcomes in samples of HIV-affected couples, this research is often conducted without regard to the influence of HIV-related stigma on these associations (e.g., Klimes et al 1992;Parsons et al 1998; Van der Straten et al 2000). Thus, future quantitative studies must include assessments of HIV-related stigma to obtain a clearer picture of how stigma influences interpersonal variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Third, although the quantitative literature has begun to uncover associations between interpersonal factors and couple-level outcomes in samples of HIV-affected couples, this research is often conducted without regard to the influence of HIV-related stigma on these associations (e.g., Klimes et al 1992;Parsons et al 1998; Van der Straten et al 2000). Thus, future quantitative studies must include assessments of HIV-related stigma to obtain a clearer picture of how stigma influences interpersonal variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, despite that research studies (e.g., Milan et al 2005;Parsons et al 1998) have revealed that couple-and individual-level outcomes are linked in samples of HIVaffected couple members, previous models have largely ignored the ways in which HIV-related stigma contributes to the couple-level outcomes of PWHAs and their partners. Consider how the detrimental influence of HIV-related stigma on psychological adjustment may be assuaged for PWHAs who are in intimate and supportive partnerships or exacerbated for PWHAs who are in distant and indifferent partnerships.…”
Section: Development and Articulation Of The Current Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gay community participation measured years and frequency of gay bar and gay event attendance, frequency of gay bathhouse ( hattenba ) attendance, organized gay group activity participation in past six-months, and identity as a gay community member. Four questions about self-efficacy for safer sex were derived from previous instruments [23,24,25], and measured participant confidence in performing specific behaviors with a partner: ‘I feel confident in using condoms even when my partner doesn’t want to’, ‘I am able to avoid behavior that puts me at risk of HIV infection’, ‘I find it difficult to discuss condom use with partners’, and ‘I find it difficult to practice safer sex when I have been drinking’.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%