2001
DOI: 10.1023/a:1011900121994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Goodin would concede that an obligation to protect a spouse outweighs an obligation to protect a stranger, 22 but only insofar as the spouse is uniquely vulnerable to his or her partner's choices. The extent of the vulnerability also matters within his moral hierarchy; 23 Goodin's moral husband should still save a drowning child rather than attend to his wife who has a foot cramp. Therefore, Carroll and Crutchfield would have to prove somehow that the emotional or spiritual suffering to which those denied procreation are vulnerable is on par with the starvation, exposure, disease, and so forth of those they could afford to help by remaining childless.…”
Section: Objectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goodin would concede that an obligation to protect a spouse outweighs an obligation to protect a stranger, 22 but only insofar as the spouse is uniquely vulnerable to his or her partner's choices. The extent of the vulnerability also matters within his moral hierarchy; 23 Goodin's moral husband should still save a drowning child rather than attend to his wife who has a foot cramp. Therefore, Carroll and Crutchfield would have to prove somehow that the emotional or spiritual suffering to which those denied procreation are vulnerable is on par with the starvation, exposure, disease, and so forth of those they could afford to help by remaining childless.…”
Section: Objectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%