2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Considering fungal:bacterial dominance in soils – Methods, controls, and ecosystem implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
562
8
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 962 publications
(642 citation statements)
references
References 146 publications
23
562
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5b), with carbon source utilization patterns of the various microbial groups (Fig. 6) reflecting previous knowledge regarding C substrate preferences, with fungi dominating litter decomposition and bacteria dominating soil decomposition (Strickland and Rousk, 2010;Gude et al, 2012). The higher soil-C assimilation of gram-positive bacteria relative to gram-negative bacteria is also consistent with previously published research confirming greater decomposition of soil-C by grampositive bacteria (Waldrop and Firestone, 2004;Gleixner, 2006, 2008;Bird et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…5b), with carbon source utilization patterns of the various microbial groups (Fig. 6) reflecting previous knowledge regarding C substrate preferences, with fungi dominating litter decomposition and bacteria dominating soil decomposition (Strickland and Rousk, 2010;Gude et al, 2012). The higher soil-C assimilation of gram-positive bacteria relative to gram-negative bacteria is also consistent with previously published research confirming greater decomposition of soil-C by grampositive bacteria (Waldrop and Firestone, 2004;Gleixner, 2006, 2008;Bird et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…While we did not measure the presence of specific carbon compounds, the increase in Basidiomycete fungi at high elevation/carbon concentration is consistent with their primary role in the production of oxidative enzymes capable of breaking down recalcitrant carbon compounds, such as lignin (Baldrian 2006, Floudas et al 2012. Alternatively, C:N, C:P and N:P ratios also peaked at high elevation, and fungi are thought to outcompete bacteria in these conditions (Strickland and Rousk 2010). Overall high ratios of these elements tended to have positive influences on fungal richness and negative influences on bacterial richness (Table S2), although elemental ratios were not the strongest predictors of fungal richness.…”
Section: Controls Over Microbial Richnessmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…As the major decomposer in soil, fungal:bacterial (F:B) dominance indicates both its response to environmental change and its impact on ecosystem function [28]. The hyphal growth form makes fungi more accessible to nutrients and resources because of its capacity for translocation of nutrients and resources from abundant microsites to limiting sites [28].…”
Section: Effects Of P Addition On Soil Microbial Community Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%