1999
DOI: 10.1023/a:1005411201187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: The E-11 and 1-B8 monoclonal antibodies raised to the smooth muscle (SM)-specific SM22 protein from pig stomach were used to study the in vivo and in vitro phenotypic characteristics of myofibroblasts (MF) and SM cells (SMC) from the bladder detrusor muscle and serosal thickening of male rabbit. The 22-kDa SM22 band found in the SM extract appeared to be composed of distinct isoforms when examined in non-equilibrium two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2D-EF): alpha (the most basic), beta, gamma, and delta (th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, central and distal fibroblasts showed immunoreactivity for the fibroblast markers prolyl 4-hydroxylase and vimentin (Figure 2B, C, F and 2G). The contractile protein Sm22 has been found to be expressed by smooth muscle cells and myofibroblasts but not by fibroblasts [16]. The isolated fibroblasts were negative for sm22.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, central and distal fibroblasts showed immunoreactivity for the fibroblast markers prolyl 4-hydroxylase and vimentin (Figure 2B, C, F and 2G). The contractile protein Sm22 has been found to be expressed by smooth muscle cells and myofibroblasts but not by fibroblasts [16]. The isolated fibroblasts were negative for sm22.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may indicate that different cell types, which were differentiated in the native tissue, may undergo myogenic conversion after 2 weeks in the culture. Several studies have reported the conversion of fibroblasts, myofibroblasts and muscle cells depending on the experimental conditions (Darby et al, 1990; Salvatori et al, 1995; Chiavegato et al, 1999; Darby and Hewitson, 2007). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison to silk matrices, the smooth muscle compartment reconstituted by the PGA augments displayed smooth muscle bundles expressing α-actin, however SM22α and calponin expression was localized to submucosal cell populations surrounding fibrotic tissue indicative of the presence of myofibroblasts at the defect site [48,49]. The reduced width of the regenerated tissue may also reflect the immature state of repair supported by the PGA implants in comparison to the silk matrices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%