Untitled

Лысенко, А. А.; Prozorov, V. V.; Tishkov, V. M.; Busyrev, V. L.

doi:10.1023/a:1025561029256

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[8] Compulsory CPR training is currently provided to healthcare students, medical professionals and employees of emergency services (i.e. fi refi ghters, rescuers, police offi cers), whereas educational opportunities for the population are basically limited to mandatory CPR training during driver's license acquisition and occasional CPR courses.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…fi refi ghters, rescuers, police offi cers), whereas educational opportunities for the population are basically limited to mandatory CPR training during driver's license acquisition and occasional CPR courses. [8][9][10] At the same time, published information on CPR education in Russia seems to be scarce and scattered, limiting an opportunity to draw fi rm conclusions on the problem.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Education in cardiopulmonary resuscitation in Russia: A systematic review of the available evidence

Birkun¹,

Glotov²

2017

World Journal of Emergency Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND:To summarise and appraise cumulative published scientifi c evidence relevant to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) education in Russia. DATA RESOURCES:We searched Medline, Scopus, Science Direct and Russian Science Citation Index databases from December 1991 to December 2016 to identify studies pertaining to the fi eld of CPR education that were carried out by Russian researchers and/or investigated the topic of interest for Russia/Russian population. Reference lists of eligible publications, contents pages of relevant Russian journals and Google Scholar were also searched. There was no limitation based on publication language or study design.RESULTS: Of 7 964 unique citations identified, 22 studies were included. All studies were published from 2009 to 2016, mainly in Russian. Only three studies were reported to be randomized controlled. Non-medical individuals constituted 17% of studied populations. Most of the studies aimed to assess effects of CPR educational interventions, generally suggesting positive infl uence of the training conducted. The studies were highly heterogeneous as for methodological approaches, structure and duration of educational interventions, evaluation methods and criteria being used. Methodological quality was generally poor, with >40% publications not passing quality screening and only 2 studies meeting the criteria of moderate high quality. CONCLUSION:The results suggest paucity, low population coverage, high thematic and methodological heterogeneity and low quality of the studies addressing CPR education, which were carried out in the Russian Federation. There is a critical need in conducting methodologically consistent, large-scale, randomized, controlled studies evaluating and comparing efficiency of educational interventions for teaching CPR in different population categories of Russia.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%