2003
DOI: 10.1023/a:1024686630821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study used two theoretical approaches to understand the short- and long-term motives behind fruit consumption. Contextual motivations focused on short-term motives using attributes and situational benefits (Fennell et al. , 2003; Fennell and Allenby, 2013), whereas transituational benefits focused on the long-term motives that encompassed emotions and human values (Gutman, 1982; Schwartz, 2017).…”
Section: Conclusion Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study used two theoretical approaches to understand the short- and long-term motives behind fruit consumption. Contextual motivations focused on short-term motives using attributes and situational benefits (Fennell et al. , 2003; Fennell and Allenby, 2013), whereas transituational benefits focused on the long-term motives that encompassed emotions and human values (Gutman, 1982; Schwartz, 2017).…”
Section: Conclusion Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an original theoretical path because it merges the two approaches of contextual motivations and the MEC model. The first recognises short-term observable product characteristics (Fennell et al, 2003;Fennell and Allenby, 2013), whereas the latter works on long-term goals, emotions (Gutman, 1982) and human values (Schwartz, 2017). The path reveals meaningful reasons for understanding the consumers' involvement and long-term adoption of healthy eating habits.…”
Section: Conclusion Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efficient document storage and retrieval for many institutions of learning have been noted to be one of the important applications of clustering. In addition, discovering events and sub-events from a sequence of news articles Rasmussen ( 1992 ), Piernik et al ( 2015 ), Chan et al ( 2016 ), Lee et al ( 2020 ), Celardo and Everett ( 2020 ) Image segmentation This is centered around the partition of images for visibility and classification of images based on some properties Forsyth and Ponce ( 2002 ), Lam and Wunsch ( 2014 ), Zhang et al ( 2020 ) Object recognition 3D object grouping has been an area of application Dorai and Jain ( 1995 ) Character recognition handwriting recognition has been an important application Connell and Jain ( 1998 ) Data mining Widely used in this field both to analyze structured and unstructured databases Hedberg ( 1996 ), Han et al ( 2011 ) Spatial and space application Large data sets from geographical information systems and satellite images have been analyzed using clustering techniques Upton and Fingleton ( 1985 ), Tahmasebi et al ( 2012 ), Song et al ( 2020 ), Zhang et al ( 2020 ) Business analytics Operational areas of marketing, demand management and production areas of product development and categorization Kiang et al ( 2007 ), Fennell et al ( 2003 ), Pereira and Frazzon ( 2020 ) Data reduction Compression of large data into manageable sizes usually saves processing time and cost Jiang et al ( 2016 ), Huang ( 1997 ) …”
Section: Applications Of Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sociodemographic characteristics are therefore not able to explain consumers' choices between national brands and private labels (Cataluña, García, & Phau, 2006). Using past research results for both for sociodemographic and psychographic characteristics, Fennell, Allenby, Yang, & Edwards (2003) conclude: "Since the early seventies, it has been known that the relationship between demographic and general psychographic variables and product use is present but not strong. The search for correlates for relative brand preference (e.g., using scanner data) has been less successful, with results suggesting that demographic and general psychographic variables are generally not predictive of brand use" (p. 241).…”
Section: Sociodemographicsmentioning
confidence: 99%