“…The researches conducted within the real work have allowed to reveal the special pattern of EEG inherent in the vast majority of athletes and characterized by more expressed activity in a theta -and delta ranges, the insufficient relative power of bioelectric activity of a brain in the alpha range, the absolute power, bigger in comparison with "norm", in the alpha range in forward areas of a brain (this feature has been noted also by other researchers working with athletes (Popova et al, 2006)), the low size of the age index, higher size of the integrated index and easing of coherence. Comparison of the obtained data with data of references, namely: manifestation of more expressed delta activity and an alpha rhythm, smaller on power, -with aggression (Fishbein et al, 1989 ); bigger expressiveness of an alpha rhythm in frontal assignments -with tendency to risky activity (Kudrin et al, 2014); rhythms a theta range -with motivation (Dubrovinskaya and Machinskaya, 2002), including with motivation of achievement as property of the personality (Konareva, 2009), selective attention (Basar-Eroglu and Demiralp, 2001;Machinskaya et al, 2016) and procedural memory (Klimesch, 1997); the reduced coherence -with independent data processing; the low size of the age index, -not only with turning on of brake mechanisms, but also, most likely, being based on the data of Gevins et al (1997), Kamzanova (2011), and, in particular, Stroganova (2001), -with prevalence of endogenous attention, and higher size of the integrated index -with weakening of external influences due to creation of an internal cycle of work of neurons (Sokolov, 1969), -allows to speak about allocation of a peculiar " encephalographic portrait of the athlete" with "sports rage" inherent in him, ability to work in extreme conditions, abstraction if necessary from the environment, the result having high motivation on achievement and ability to expense of the maximum strong-willed efforts for achievement of the required purpose. Specification of this "portrait" and its change in process of self-control with biological feedback, certainly, are individual and in many respects are defined by set of different factors, including sexual distinctions.…”