2003
DOI: 10.1023/a:1022904125479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
86
0
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
11
86
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The event was associated with a very strong intensity enhancement, with the electron temperature in the wave estimated to be ∼2-4 MK, and the Mach number of the shock estimated to be ∼1.1-1.3 (these estimates are dependent on the assumed coronal ambient temperature). Hudson et al (2003) concluded that the observations were consistent with the interpretation of the X-ray emission front as the signature of a coronal shock wave at a low Mach number. The cause of the shock wave was hypothesized to be due to plasma motions that began at a relatively small distance from the flare core, with this conclusion due to the close association between the excitation of the wave and the beginning of the impulsive phase of the flare.…”
Section: Euv and X-ray Signatures Of Coronal Bright Frontssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The event was associated with a very strong intensity enhancement, with the electron temperature in the wave estimated to be ∼2-4 MK, and the Mach number of the shock estimated to be ∼1.1-1.3 (these estimates are dependent on the assumed coronal ambient temperature). Hudson et al (2003) concluded that the observations were consistent with the interpretation of the X-ray emission front as the signature of a coronal shock wave at a low Mach number. The cause of the shock wave was hypothesized to be due to plasma motions that began at a relatively small distance from the flare core, with this conclusion due to the close association between the excitation of the wave and the beginning of the impulsive phase of the flare.…”
Section: Euv and X-ray Signatures Of Coronal Bright Frontssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The next observation of an X-ray wave was made by Hudson et al (2003), with an Xray wave associated with an X-class flare and Type II, III, and IV radio bursts. In this event, a large loop structure to the north of the flare core is observed to explode outwards, with the wave appearing to emanate from this location.…”
Section: Euv and X-ray Signatures Of Coronal Bright Frontsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See also Fig. 3 in Hudson et al 2003). Later a wave-like signature, inferred to be the direct observation of a shock wave seen in soft X-rays (Khan & Hudson 2000;Hudson et al 2003) was observed (indicated by the white arrow in Fig.…”
Section: Yohkoh Soft X-ray Telescope Imagesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Here we refer to the M-class flare as "Flare 1" and the X-class flare as "Flare 2". Some aspects of Flare 2 and phenomena associated with it have already been examined and reported elsewhere (e.g., Khan & Hudson 2000;Klassen et al 2001;Hudson et al 2003). In this paper we concentrate on aspects related to the shrinking and expanding coronal loops associated with Flare 2.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…These manifestations occur in tandem to the large-scale front which is essentially the EUV wave. Moreover, EUV waves are frequently associated with phenomena observed in other wavelength domains such as Moreton waves in the chromospheric Hα (e.g., Thompson et al, 2000;Warmuth et al, 2001) and He I 10830 A lines (e.g., Vršnak et al, 2002), and in the corona in Soft X-rays (SXRs) (e.g., Khan and Aurass, 2002;Hudson et al, 2003;Warmuth, Mann, and Aurass, 2005) microwaves (e.g., Warmuth et al, 2004;White and Thompson, 2005) and in the metric-range (e.g., Vršnak et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%