2013
DOI: 10.2204/iodp.sp.350.2013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Expedition 350 was the first expedition to drill in the Izu rear arc; all previous Integrated Ocean Drilling Program sites were drilled in or near the Izu-Bonin arc front or fore arc ( Figure F1B), leading to an incomplete view of Izu arc magmatism. Thus, the main objective of Expedition 350 was to reveal the history of "the missing half " of the subduction factory (Tamura et al, 2013). The second expedition (351) will focus on IBM arc origins by drilling west of the Kyushu-Palau Ridge (Figure F3), where it is inferred that the foundation, origin, and early evolution of the IBM arc are recorded (Arculus et al, 2013).…”
Section: Background and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Expedition 350 was the first expedition to drill in the Izu rear arc; all previous Integrated Ocean Drilling Program sites were drilled in or near the Izu-Bonin arc front or fore arc ( Figure F1B), leading to an incomplete view of Izu arc magmatism. Thus, the main objective of Expedition 350 was to reveal the history of "the missing half " of the subduction factory (Tamura et al, 2013). The second expedition (351) will focus on IBM arc origins by drilling west of the Kyushu-Palau Ridge (Figure F3), where it is inferred that the foundation, origin, and early evolution of the IBM arc are recorded (Arculus et al, 2013).…”
Section: Background and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This site was chosen to provide a temporal record of rear-arc magma compositions, ideally from Paleogene to Neogene time, allowing comparison with the previously drilled fore-arc magmatic record and determination of across-arc geochemical variations throughout the history of the arc system. Rear-arc magmatic evolution is important to understand because the chemistry of the samples dredged from the tops of rear-arc volcanoes are more similar to the average composition of continental crust than those of arc-front volcanoes, and seismic crustal structure suggests that the rear arc overlies the majority of "continental type" crust in the Izu arc system (Tamura et al, 2013). Figure F1.…”
Section: Background and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Expedition 350 was the first expedition to drill in the Izu rear arc; all previous IODP/ODP sites were drilled in or near the Izu-Bonin arc front or fore-arc ( Figure 2), leading to an incomplete view of Izu arc magmatism. Thus, the main objective of Expedition 350 was to reveal the history of "the missing half" of the subduction factory (Tamura et al, 2013). The second expedition (351) focused on IBM arc origins by drilling west of the Kyushu-Palau Ridge (Figure 1), where it was inferred that the foundation, origin, and early evolution of the IBM arc are recorded (Arculus et al, 2013(Arculus et al, , 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%