Untitled

Abstract

BackgroundThe medical "brain drain" has been described as rich countries "looting" doctors and nurses from developing countries undermining their health systems and public health. However this "brain-drain" might also be seen as a success in the training and "export" of health professionals and the benefits this provides. This paper illustrates the arguments and possible policy options by focusing on the situation in one of the poorest countries in the world, Malawi.DiscussionMany see this "brain drain" of medical staff as wrong with developed countries exploiting poorer ones. The effects are considerable with Malawi facing high vacancy rates in its public health system, and with migration threatening to outstrip training despite efforts to improve pay and conditions. This shortage of staff has made it more challenging for Malawi to deliver on its Essential Health Package and to absorb new international health funding.Yet, without any policy effort Malawi has been able to demonstrate its global competitiveness in the training ("production") of skilled health professionals. Remittances from migration are a large and growing source of foreign exchange for poor countries and tend to go directly to households. Whilst the data for Malawi is limited, studies from other poor countries demonstrate the power of remittances in significantly reducing poverty.Malawi can benefit from the export of health professionals provided there is a resolution of the situation whereby the state pays for training and the benefits are gained by the individual professional working abroad. Solutions include migrating staff paying back training costs, or rich host governments remitting part of a tax (e.g. income or national insurance) to the Malawi government. These schemes would allow Malawi to scale up training of health professionals for local needs and to work abroad.SummaryThere is concern about the negative impacts of the medical "brain-drain". However a closer look at the evidence for and against the medical "brain-drain" in Malawi suggests that there are potential gains in managing medical migration to produce outcomes that are beneficial to individuals, households and the country. Finally we present several policy options.

The brain drain of health care professionals from sub-Saharan Africa: A geographic perspective

“…Malawi has only 10 per cent of the medical doctors and 40 per cent of the nurses recommended by WHO such that in 2007 only 5 per cent of physician posts and 65 per cent of nursing vacancies could be fi lled (Nduru, 2007). Indeed, the often quoted phrase that 'there are more Malawian-trained doctors in Manchester, UK, than there are in Malawi' means that the main health care providers in Malawi are now nurses and poorly trained medical assistants (Record and Mohiddin, 2006).…”

Using participatory methods to design an mHealth intervention for a low income country, a case study in Chikwawa, Malawi

“…Even when health care is accessed, Malawi has one of the highest doctor to patient ratios in the world at 0.019 physicians per 1000 people compared to 2.8 physicians in the UK [56]. The extensive staff and resource limitations in Malawian healthcare are underpinned by financial constraints, lack of trained workforce, and workforce migration [1, 41, 58]. This affects not only curative but also preventative health care, which if implemented effectively, could have a significant impact on reducing the main causes of morbidity and mortality e.g.…”

Stemming the impact of health professional brain drain from Africa: a systemic review of policy options

“…4 This implies that the distribution of health workers is most likely going to be further skewed in favor of the developed world. Latest figures suggest that Africa carries 25% of the world’s disease burden, yet has only 3% of the world’s health workers and only 1% of the world’s economic resources.…”