1997
DOI: 10.1023/a:1001764130608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We included the molecular species CN (an up-to-date compilation privately provided by B. Plez), C 2 (Querci et al 1971;U. Jørgensen, priv.…”
Section: Metallicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We included the molecular species CN (an up-to-date compilation privately provided by B. Plez), C 2 (Querci et al 1971;U. Jørgensen, priv.…”
Section: Metallicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore also important to estimate the abundance of Fe and Mg, as reliably as possible. Hence, the Fe, Mg, Si, and Ti abundances of our Arcturus modeling are based on the optically determined abundances derived by Fulbright et al (2007), but (Langhoff & Bauschlicher 1993), CH (Jørgensen et al 1996), CN (Jørgensen & Larsson 1990;and Plez 1998, private communications), OH (Goldman et al 1998), and C 2 (Querci et al 1971;and Jørgensen 2001, private communications). For the molecules, the linelists were adopted as they were, leading to the following C, N, and O abundances for Arcturus from the spectra in the Arcturus atlas (Hinkle et al 1995a): log ε C = 8.08 ± 0.11 (from CO lines), log ε N = 7.64 ± 0.09 (from CN lines), and log ε O = 8.70 ± 0.13 (from OH lines), which are in excellent agreement with the values derived by Ryde et al (2009) and by the optical work by Lecureur (2007), who derived log ε(C) = 7.96 ± 0.10, log ε(N) = 7.74 ± 0.10, and log ε(O) = 8.70 ± 0.05.…”
Section: Synthetic Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimated accuracy should be slightly better than ±100 K, possibly ±80 K. These results are consistent with the mean direct effective temperatures as quoted in Table 3. We used older models from Querci et al (1974) and Querci & Querci (1976) for the hotter HC-stars. The value C/O 3.5 they adopted seems too high when compared to the results of Lambert et al (1986) for the CV stars (C/O ≤ 2.0).…”
Section: The Mean Seds Of the Photometric Groups And Model Atmospherementioning
confidence: 99%