Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Respondent's decisions for each choice set of the DCE relied on a Likert scale with seven levels of certainty: Definitely will not take classes (1), not likely to take classes (2), somewhat not likely to take classes (3), undecided (4), somewhat likely to take classes (5), likely to take classes (6), and definitely will take classes (7). Using this response format captures more information about the underlying strength of preference/certainty of the respondent, while still maintaining a theoretically and valid construct (Wang, 1997; Whitehead et al, 1998). A potential limitation of this type of ex ante assessment of enrollment intention is that students may indicate they may not enroll, but many students may not follow through with those intentions (e.g., Farrington, 2021).…”
Section: Dce and Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respondent's decisions for each choice set of the DCE relied on a Likert scale with seven levels of certainty: Definitely will not take classes (1), not likely to take classes (2), somewhat not likely to take classes (3), undecided (4), somewhat likely to take classes (5), likely to take classes (6), and definitely will take classes (7). Using this response format captures more information about the underlying strength of preference/certainty of the respondent, while still maintaining a theoretically and valid construct (Wang, 1997; Whitehead et al, 1998). A potential limitation of this type of ex ante assessment of enrollment intention is that students may indicate they may not enroll, but many students may not follow through with those intentions (e.g., Farrington, 2021).…”
Section: Dce and Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DBDC method implies that two different monetary payments are subsequently suggested to survey respondents. The second amount proposed to respondents is contingent on their response to the first proposed monetary payment [42][43][44]. The DBDC technique was adopted for its several advantages.…”
Section: Questionnaire Design and Wtp Elicitation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The open-ended question asked directly for the maximum WTP after the first two questions of yes/no type. Both elicitation approaches were used to increase construct validity of the WTP estimates [43].…”
Section: Questionnaire Design and Wtp Elicitation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the hypothetical nature of these techniques, there is one way to validate them: testing their internal consistency by targeting the key elements in the valuation scenarios that guarantee a realistic market simulation. This means testing for construct validity, which includes theoretical and convergent validity (Whitehead, et al, 1995;Whitehead, et al, 1998). Theoretical validity (also termed internal validity) refers to the extent to which the findings of the study (the measure of WTP) are consistent with theoretical predictions and a priori expectations (Schläpfer, 2008); while convergent validity assesses whether two measures of WTP from different methods or choice techniques are correlated and therefore converge to similar estimates (Diamond & Hausman, 1993) 40 .…”
Section: Contingent Valuation and Choice Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%