2002
DOI: 10.1023/a:1020264611438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S2). If the mutual orientation of the CAT and PRD1 domains was fixed, both domains would have the same correlation time of 29 ns (as predicted by Hydronmr for a closed structure obtained by combining the CAT C-terminal and PRD1 N-terminal (19). CAT correlation peaks are numbered in red if not shifted and in black (and connected by black lines) if shifted.…”
Section: D99n Mutation Of Prd1 Restores Cat Rna Binding Activity-mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…S2). If the mutual orientation of the CAT and PRD1 domains was fixed, both domains would have the same correlation time of 29 ns (as predicted by Hydronmr for a closed structure obtained by combining the CAT C-terminal and PRD1 N-terminal (19). CAT correlation peaks are numbered in red if not shifted and in black (and connected by black lines) if shifted.…”
Section: D99n Mutation Of Prd1 Restores Cat Rna Binding Activity-mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Fig. 4 shows the chemical shift index plot for backbone and C␤ carbon atoms of native LicT CAT-PRD1 based on the sequential resonance assignment of the triply labeled protein reported previously (19). The predicted secondary structure of CAT-PRD1 in the inactive state deduced from this plot indicates that at least three of the four original ␤-strands of the CAT monomer are present in native CAT-PRD1.…”
Section: D99n Mutation Of Prd1 Restores Cat Rna Binding Activity-mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations