2000
DOI: 10.1023/a:1006612023656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference from outdoor tests is that a field survey cannot control delamination properties; thus, some studies have compared the results using other NDTs [20,131,160]. Another disadvantage is the influence of noise, for example, reflections from surroundings [175,176], emissivity variation on the surface [27], subsurface material differences [97], and uneven solar heat gain [97]. In addition, thermal contrast can be caused by other subsurface defects, such as water penetration and high moisture content [20,176,177].…”
Section: Test Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference from outdoor tests is that a field survey cannot control delamination properties; thus, some studies have compared the results using other NDTs [20,131,160]. Another disadvantage is the influence of noise, for example, reflections from surroundings [175,176], emissivity variation on the surface [27], subsurface material differences [97], and uneven solar heat gain [97]. In addition, thermal contrast can be caused by other subsurface defects, such as water penetration and high moisture content [20,176,177].…”
Section: Test Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another disadvantage is the influence of noise, for example, reflections from surroundings [175,176], emissivity variation on the surface [27], subsurface material differences [97], and uneven solar heat gain [97]. In addition, thermal contrast can be caused by other subsurface defects, such as water penetration and high moisture content [20,176,177].…”
Section: Test Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, as in Figure 9b, in the case where the seamless insulation was installed in the external wall, separating from the internal wall, the measurement showed a good condition of the internal wall without condensation and mold. The thermography techniques for detecting defects in building envelopes, such as missing insulation, thermal bridging, and cracks and moisture problems, using a thermal imaging camera, have been discussed in various studies [55][56][57]; thus, no detailed explanation is given in this study. Further examples of improvements can be found in the Appendix A.…”
Section: Integrated Solutions For Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solar loading thermography [2,[26][27][28][29] is a promising NDT approach for inspecting large civil engineering constructions. In such applications, it is difficult, sometimes impossible, to thermally stimulate the tested object with an artificial energy source.…”
Section: Solar Loading Thermographymentioning
confidence: 99%