2002
DOI: 10.1023/a:1016331128897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: This population-based case-control study found that those individuals working in occupations associated with beef cattle are at increased risk for developing leukemia and lymphoma while those working in occupations requiring the handling of fish are at decreased risk of leukemia and lymphoma.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
14
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This association seems to be particularly strong for occupational exposure to animals or their products. Previous studies reported a globally increased risk of NHL among individuals exposed to livestock, mainly cattle and pigs (Amadori et al , 1995; Svec et al , 2005; Tranah et al , 2008), or working with meat (Fritschi et al , 2002; McLean and Pearce, 2004), although these associations were not confirmed (Holly et al , 1997; Persson and Fredrikson, 1999; Dryver et al , 2004; Moore et al , 2007). These inconsistencies may be due to the fact that NHLs were considered as a single entity or that only the major NHL histotypes were analysed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This association seems to be particularly strong for occupational exposure to animals or their products. Previous studies reported a globally increased risk of NHL among individuals exposed to livestock, mainly cattle and pigs (Amadori et al , 1995; Svec et al , 2005; Tranah et al , 2008), or working with meat (Fritschi et al , 2002; McLean and Pearce, 2004), although these associations were not confirmed (Holly et al , 1997; Persson and Fredrikson, 1999; Dryver et al , 2004; Moore et al , 2007). These inconsistencies may be due to the fact that NHLs were considered as a single entity or that only the major NHL histotypes were analysed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Underlying autoimmunity and exposure to environmental, occupational, or infectious agents have been suggested to increase the risk of NHLs (Guidoboni et al , 2006; Alexander et al , 2007; Blinder and Fisher, 2008; Hjalgrim and Engels, 2008; Marcucci and Mele, 2011). Several animals may be carriers of lymphomagenic infectious agents, and indeed elevated risks have been variably associated with contacts to livestock (Amadori et al , 1995; Svec et al , 2005; Tranah et al , 2008), or with occupational exposure to meat (Fritschi et al , 2002; McLean and Pearce, 2004). However, as available evidence is inconclusive (Moore et al , 2007), as a likely consequence of NHL heterogeneity, subtype-specific aetiological research is required.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A case-control study in New Zealand found an increase in hematological cancer mortality in adults who grew up on a poultry farm (t Mannetje et al 2012). A case-control study in Canada found no association between occupational exposure to poultry, horses, or pigs and leukemia in adults (Fritschi et al 2002). A cohort study of male farmers in Iowa and North Carolina found no association between farmers engaged in poultry or beef production and leukemia incidence (Beane Freeman et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the hematopoietic system is involved with immunity and is the origin of AML, frequent exposure to viruses and infectious agents may initiate immune responses that promote hematopoietic malignancies [37]. Previous research has found that workers who work with living animals may be at risk for leukemia [23,32,33,37–39]. Various livestock (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…electronic component manufacturing) [20,21], dry cleaners [22–24], protective services occupations (e.g. firefighters and police) [23], teachers [23,25], childcare workers [16], registered nurses [23,26,27], diagnostic related technicians [23,26], maids and housekeepers [27], hairdressers [6], barbers [6], radio and telecommunication workers [31], welding, soldering and brazing workers [31], automotive mechanics [23], tool and die makers [22], butchers [32,33], shoe makers [34] and workers employed in oil/gas/rubber I&Os (who may be exposed to benzene and its byproducts) [6,25]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%