2000
DOI: 10.1023/a:1018607809852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: We discuss replica symmetry breaking (RSB) in spin glasses. We update work in this area, from both the analytical and numerical points of view. We give particular attention to the difficulties stressed by Newman and Stein concerning the problem of constructing pure states in spin glass systems. We mainly discuss what happens in finite-dimensional, realistic spin glasses. Together with a detailed review of some of the most important features, facts, data, and phenomena, we present some new theoretical ideas and… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
278
3
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 222 publications
(305 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
23
278
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The only prediction which seems to be compatible with our data is the one coming from the mean-field-like scenario of finite-dimensional spin glasses [8,26,27], which predicts a full replica symmetry breaking solution for the EdwardsAnderson model and assign it to category C. In Fig. 7 we also plot a second straight line to emphasize the curvature of the data in the aging regime.…”
Section: Edwards-anderson Modelsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The only prediction which seems to be compatible with our data is the one coming from the mean-field-like scenario of finite-dimensional spin glasses [8,26,27], which predicts a full replica symmetry breaking solution for the EdwardsAnderson model and assign it to category C. In Fig. 7 we also plot a second straight line to emphasize the curvature of the data in the aging regime.…”
Section: Edwards-anderson Modelsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…While the scaling arguments by Krzakala and Martin [10] predict a decrease of P (q = 0, L) at zero temperature at least with an exponent −d s /2 (if one assumes with them that the system shows RSB, implying θ = 0), which lies somewhere between -1.1 and -1.3, the best Monte-Carlo simulations find only a value around -0.9 [11,14]. Other Monte-Carlo simulations giving a considerably smaller exponent probably do not sample the ground state configurations with the appropriate weights (see the comment by Marinari et al [15] on the simulations by Hatano and Gubernatis [16], and the remarks by Palassini and Young [11] on the simulations by Hartmann [17].) Our findings of a surprisingly slow approach to the correct asymptotic scaling can reconcile the Monte-Carlo results with the predictions by Krzakala and Martin, and also with our predictions based on the droplet picture (where the asymptotic exponent is around -1.4 or -1.5), which we believe to be the correct description of the spin-glass phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While many Monte-Carlo simulations show properties conforming to the replica-symmetry-breaking (RSB) scenario (implying many low-temperature states and a lack of self-averaging) [1,2], other simulations [3] and analytical arguments [4] favour the droplet picture (a scaling theory based on the existence of only one lowtemperature state and its time reverse). The ambiguities stem from the difficulty in reaching the asymptotic limit of low temperatures and large system sizes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In figure 1, we display results for very small sizes (N = 4 − 11) obtained from exact computations of the partition function (such analysis was done in 23 for the SK model) averaging over 10000 samples of Gaussian quenched couplings with variance 1/N . In figure 2 we show results for larger sizes (N = 32, 64, 128, 256, 512) using the parallel tempering technique 24,25 with binary couplings. The number of samples ranges from 1000 for the smallest size, N = 32, to 250 for the biggest one, N = 512.…”
Section: A Zero-field Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%