2002
DOI: 10.1023/a:1022995922992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
80
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 474 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
10
80
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of changing grain size was more predictable than the effect of changing extent for various North American landscapes, a finding that our results support [17]. The curves of the three samples show the same trend, and their relationships can be fit by the same functions.…”
Section: Impact Of Grain Size On Landscape Metricssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effect of changing grain size was more predictable than the effect of changing extent for various North American landscapes, a finding that our results support [17]. The curves of the three samples show the same trend, and their relationships can be fit by the same functions.…”
Section: Impact Of Grain Size On Landscape Metricssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In this paper, we calculated 12 landscape-level and six class-level landscape metrics in arid valleys and generated response curves for grain size and landscape pattern. In a previous study on this subject, the metrics were classified into three categories (Wu et al, 2002); another study identified four types of metrics: monotonic increase, monotonic decrease, no change, or erratic [61]. We followed the four-category classification and refined the predictable responses to two, either increasing or decreasing.…”
Section: Impact Of Grain Size On Landscape Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference may be a function of scale, which is defined by the resolution (i.e., grain) and extent of the available spatial data. Numerous studies (54)(55)(56)(57)(58)(59)(60)(61)(62) have found that changing the study scale changes the strength of associations and interactions. For example, in a study on habitat use by Eleodes hispilabris, McIntyre (62) found that E. hispilabris avoided shrubs at small scales but selectively occupied shrubland at larger scales, which may be due to different mechanisms influencing habitat selection at the different scales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous landscape pattern metrics have been developed to characterize the composition and configuration of land cover types in the urban environment [49][50][51][52]. We selected the most commonly used landscape composition metrics, the percentage of landscape area (PLAND) and two other diversity metrics: Shannon's diversity index (SHDI) and Shannon's evenness index (SHEI) [51].…”
Section: Landscape Pattern Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%