2003
DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200305150-00017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: Transcranial electrical motor-evoked potential monitoring allowed successful intraoperative monitoring. The criterion of one recording showing a response amplitude decrease of more than 80% during a surgical action can be considered a valuable warning criterion for neurologic damage. The authors also consider that monitoring at six instead of two muscles improves the value of neuromonitoring.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The anesthetic agent was ketamine, 200 mg/hr via infusion during these experiments. The most commonly used criteria for alerting to a clinically relevant event during MEP monitoring is either a 100% or 80% loss of signal 28 . Therefore, the time for DCS to detect a 50% drop in blood flow from baseline was compared with the time for motor evoked potential (MEP) signals to drop by 80% from baseline upon performing an aortic clamping in three sheep.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anesthetic agent was ketamine, 200 mg/hr via infusion during these experiments. The most commonly used criteria for alerting to a clinically relevant event during MEP monitoring is either a 100% or 80% loss of signal 28 . Therefore, the time for DCS to detect a 50% drop in blood flow from baseline was compared with the time for motor evoked potential (MEP) signals to drop by 80% from baseline upon performing an aortic clamping in three sheep.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…that an 80% reduction in amplitude was significant in spinal surgery. [11] The relative amplitude indexes with and without CMAP compensation were calculated at the beginning of the operative procedure (at the introduction of the microscope after craniotomy in a cranial operation) and at the end of the procedure (just before dural closure in a cranial operation). [29] The alarm-point amplitude reduction rate of postoperative motor palsy was determined according to the sensitivity and specificity of each amplitude reduction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LR between 1 and 2 and between 0.5-1 rarely alter pretest probability. 6 Despite traditional spinal IOM literature suggests that NIOM is effective in identifying patients at a high risk for sustaining new spinal cord injuries [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] as well as animal research has supported human experience, [16][17][18] there is a heterogeneity in IOM services and this should be reviewed to see what accounts for the difference in false-positive and false-negative cases in the literature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%