2001
DOI: 10.1023/a:1010237711077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: The bacterial diversity in two uranium waste piles was studied. Total DNA was recovered from a large number of soil samples collected from different sites and depths in the piles using two procedures for direct lysis. Significant differences in the bacterial composition of the samples were revealed by the use of rep-APD, RISA and 16S ARDREA. The 16S rDNA analyses showed that the uranium wastes were dominated by Acidithiobacillusferrooxidans and by several Pseudomonas species classified in the gamma-subdivision… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The closest BLAST matches to the SOSED group are from environmental clones from soils in Australia [17], Hawaii [12], Germany [13], England [7], California [24] and the Netherlands [19], as well as deep sea sediments [34], freshwater lake sediments [31], uranium mining waste [38] and a hot spring [22] (ESM Supplemental data 4). A preliminary designation of this group by İnceoğlu et al [19] was environmental group 2; we refer to it as the SOSED (soil/sediment) group as the BLAST matches and our sequences were from marine and terrestrial soils and sediments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The closest BLAST matches to the SOSED group are from environmental clones from soils in Australia [17], Hawaii [12], Germany [13], England [7], California [24] and the Netherlands [19], as well as deep sea sediments [34], freshwater lake sediments [31], uranium mining waste [38] and a hot spring [22] (ESM Supplemental data 4). A preliminary designation of this group by İnceoğlu et al [19] was environmental group 2; we refer to it as the SOSED (soil/sediment) group as the BLAST matches and our sequences were from marine and terrestrial soils and sediments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This perception, however, may be biased due to the low number of acidobacterial isolates of which most belong to subdivision 1. Members of subdivisions 2 and 13 have repeatedly been detected in higher abundances in U-contaminated environments (Selenska-Pobell et al, 2001; Barns et al, 2007). The occurrence of subdivision 2 populations in Amazonian forest soils was correlated to the microbial availability of CO 2 , Fe, and Al 3+ .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of the five groups have previously been reported to be highly abundant in AMD systems. Their first detection was in peatlands (DA052, DA111, TM214) (Rheims et al, 1996; Felske et al, 1998) and uranium waste piles (KF-JG30-18, JG37-AG-4, DA111) (Selenska-Pobell et al, 2001; Selenska-Pobell, 2002). Phylogenetic analysis of nearly complete 16S rRNA gene sequences also revealed relationships to populations present in acidic, metal-rich, and contaminated soil environments (Supplementary Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total DNA was extracted from the sediment RB sample as described by Selenska-Pobell et al [20] with some modifications. A sample (3 L) was concentrated by cross-flow filtration through sterile hollow fiber cartridges (1.2  μ m pore-size glass fiber prefilter and 0.2  μ m membrane filter; Millipore).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%