Untitled

Paulson, Robert I.; Post, Rachel L.; Herinckx, Heidi; Risser, Patrick

doi:10.1023/a:1014591020400

Cited by 34 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Other aspects of IPS implementation, which are not captured by the IPS fidelity scale, such as the nature of the relationship between the IPS worker and the client (which was an independent predictor of outcome in the EQOLISE study)26 may also explain the poorer outcomes found in this study. A recently developed modified IPS fidelity scale (IPS+) also includes rating essential processes such as consumer choice,27 and the IPS fidelity rating carried out in this study may have been lower if the IPS+ had been used.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Supported employment: randomised controlled trial

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundThere is evidence from North American trials that supported employment using the individual placement and support (IPS) model is effective in helping individuals with severe mental illness gain competitive employment. There have been few trials in other parts of the world.AimsTo investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of IPS in the UK.MethodIndividuals with severe mental illness in South London were randomised to IPS or local traditional vocational services (treatment as usual) (ISRCTN96677673).ResultsTwo hundred and nineteen participants were randomised, and 90% assessed 1 year later. There were no significant differences between the treatment as usual and intervention groups in obtaining competitive employment (13% in the intervention group and 7% in controls; risk ratio 1.35, 95% CI 0.95–1.93, P = 0.15), nor in secondary outcomes.ConclusionsThere was no evidence that IPS was of significant benefit in achieving competitive employment for individuals in South London at 1-year follow-up, which may reflect suboptimal implementation. Implementation of IPS can be challenging in the UK context where IPS is not structurally integrated with mental health services, and economic disincentives may lead to lower levels of motivation in individuals with severe mental illness and psychiatric professionals.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Supported employment: randomised controlled trial

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…All 20 had at least four days of training in the EFIT model, and seven had at least 12 days of advanced training. The research literature varies in the number of expert raters used to develop a measure of adherence, with some studies using as few as two (Paulson et al, 2002).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of the emotionally focused individual therapy adherence measure: Conceptualisation and preliminary reliability

Schäfer

Edwards

Allan

et al. 2021

Couns and Psychother Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Emotionally Focused Individual Therapy Adherence Measure (EFIT-AM) is presented as a scale to measure a therapist's adherence to the EFIT model. The theoretical rationale for EFIT as a promising model of individual therapy and conceptual development of EFIT-AM are introduced. The EFIT-AM was developed to measure therapist adherence to treatment tasks when working specifically with clients presenting with negative emotional disorder and can be used to promote therapist education and development in training and supervision. The measure includes assessment of essential skills, meta-themes, and stages of EFIT. The measure was piloted using participants (n = 20) with advanced training in EFT. Participants used the measure to rate therapist adherence to EFIT model by observing a recorded therapy session of an expert EFIT therapist. Participant ratings were used to examine consistency among ratings of therapist behaviour and to receive feedback regarding the user experience of the EFIT-AM. Mean item ratings of three and five within the same talk turn were considered to signify reliable identification of an EFIT skill. Of the 18 adherence items on the EFIT-AM, 12 items met our criteria for 50% of participants identifying the item at the same time with a rating of three or five. Six items did not meet these criteria and were considered to either occur at a session, as opposed to talk turn, level or in need of consolidation. The high level of inter-rater reliability and internal consistency of the EFIT-AM indicates the EFIT-AM is a promising tool to evaluate therapist adherence.

show abstract

“…It is, therefore, common practice to use fidelity criteria to monitor fidelity of an intervention (Mowbray et al , 2003). Routine monitoring of programme delivery is also of great importance for ensuring consistency, particularly in multi-site studies (Paulson et al , 2002). In addition, fidelity measures can also serve as records of programme delivery to refer to, for example, when investigating why an intervention is ineffective (Chen and Chen, 1990; Hohmann and Katherine Shear, 2002; Mowbray et al , 2003).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Reflective Fostering Programme fidelity rating scale: development and inter-rater reliability

Midgley¹,

Cirasola²,

Sprecher³

et al. 2023

JCS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this study is to describe the development of the 14-item reflective fostering fidelity rating (RFFR), an observational rating system to evaluate model fidelity of group facilitators in the Reflective Fostering Programme (RFP), a mentalisation-based psychoeducation programme to support foster carers. The authors assess usability, dimensionality, inter-rater reliability and discriminative ability of the RFFR. Design/methodology/approach Eighty video clip extracts documenting 20 RFP sessions were independently rated by four raters using the RFFR. The dimensionality of the RFFR was assessed using principal components analysis. Inter-rater agreement was assessed using the intra-class correlation coefficient. Findings The proportion of missing ratings was low at 2.8%. A single principal component summarised over 90% of the variation in ratings for each rater. The inter-rater reliability of individual item ratings was poor-to-moderate, but a summary score had acceptable inter-rater reliability. The authors present evidence that the RFFR can distinguish RFP sessions that differ in treatment fidelity. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first investigation and report of the RFFR’s validity in assessing the programme fidelity of the RFP. The paper concludes that the RFFR is an appropriate rating measure for treatment fidelity of the RFP and useful for the purposes of both quality control and supervision.

show abstract

Untitled

Cited by 34 publications

References 6 publications

Supported employment: randomised controlled trial

Supported employment: randomised controlled trial

Development of the emotionally focused individual therapy adherence measure: Conceptualisation and preliminary reliability

The Reflective Fostering Programme fidelity rating scale: development and inter-rater reliability

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About