2003
DOI: 10.1023/a:1025730901955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: The goal of this article is to examine whether mouse lines genetically selected for short and long attack latencies are good animal models for antisocial behavior in humans. To this end, we compared male Short and Long Attack Latency mice (SAL and LAL, respectively) with the extremes of the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study (men who persistently displayed antisocial behavior [Persisters] and men who never manifested antisocial behavior [Abstainers]). Groups were compared on the basis of fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To understand maladaptive or pathological levels of aggression, which translates to clinically significant levels of aggression (or violence) in humans, we need to dissect those escalated types of aggression from species-typical behaviors in animal models (Miczek et al 2002, 2004; Haller and Kruk 2006; Nelson and Trainor 2007; de Boer et al, 2009). One important aspect is the nature of the attack behaviors, which can be examined by assessing the targets of attacks (Haller et al 2002) or females (Sluyter et al 2003). For example, optogenetic activation of a subdivision of the ventromedial hypothalamus (VMHvl) induced abnormal attack behavior toward females and even toward inanimate objects (Lin et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To understand maladaptive or pathological levels of aggression, which translates to clinically significant levels of aggression (or violence) in humans, we need to dissect those escalated types of aggression from species-typical behaviors in animal models (Miczek et al 2002, 2004; Haller and Kruk 2006; Nelson and Trainor 2007; de Boer et al, 2009). One important aspect is the nature of the attack behaviors, which can be examined by assessing the targets of attacks (Haller et al 2002) or females (Sluyter et al 2003). For example, optogenetic activation of a subdivision of the ventromedial hypothalamus (VMHvl) induced abnormal attack behavior toward females and even toward inanimate objects (Lin et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the ritualistic species-typical aggressive behaviors, some models for abnormal aggression showed attacks directed at vulnerable body targets such as the face and abdominal areas (Haller et al 2001). Other models of abnormal aggression in male rodents highlight aggressive behaviors against females (Sluyter et al 2003). The form of the aggressive behaviors must be considered when evaluating whether aggression is to be considered species-typical or “pathological.”…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting 50 years ago, three major independent selection experiments were conducted, resulting in three different strains of high- and low-aggressive mice (Miczek et al 2001): (1) the Turku Aggressive (TA) and Turku Non Aggressive (TNA) lines originated from an outbred colony of Swiss albino laboratory mice (Lagerspetz 1964; Nyberg et al 2004), (2) the aggressive Short Attack Latency (SAL) and low-aggressive Long Attack Latency (LAL) mice originated from a population of wild-trapped feral house mice (Sluyter et al 2003; van Oortmerssen and Bakker 1981) and (3) the high-aggressive NC900 and low-aggressive NC100 mice derived from an ICR (Institute of Cancer Research) laboratory Swiss-Webster outbred stock (Cairns et al 1983). Although these lines came from different genetic backgrounds and different laboratories with their own housing idiosyncrasies, and although selection criteria differed in terms of testing environment, type of test, type of opponent, the offensive aggression levels of these strains are generally comparable.…”
Section: Escalated Aggressive Behavior In Unselected Feral Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several lines of mice have been selected for differences in attack latency, including the SAL and LAL mice (van Oortmerssen and Bakker, 1981), the Turku aggressive and non-aggressive mice (Sandnabba, 1996), and the North Carolina 900 and 100 mice (Gariepy et al, 1996). Among these selection lines, the SAL mice show the most excessive and abnormal forms of aggression (Sluyter et al, 2003; Haller and Kruk, 2006; Natarajan et al, 2009). However, a significant difference in anxiety-related behaviours between SAL and LAL mice has not been consistently found (Hogg et al, 2000; Veenema et al, 2003a).…”
Section: Rodent Models Of Aggression: Link To Anxietymentioning
confidence: 99%