2006
DOI: 10.1186/1743-8977-3-10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: Background: Particles are known to induce both cytokine release (MIP-2, TNF-α), a reduction in cell viability and an increased apoptosis in alveolar macrophages. To examine whether these responses are triggered by the same particle determinants, alveolar macrophages were exposed in vitro to mineral particles of different physical-chemical properties.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
9
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While similar trends were observed, few of the apparent differences reached statistical significance in the combined culture of HBEC3-KT cells and THP-1 macrophages, compared with the corresponding monocultures. In line with previous studies from our group, differences in surface area could not fully explain the differences between the particle samples [ 47 , 48 ], suggesting that the differences in potency were due to other parameters, such as particle composition or surface reactivity. After correcting for differences in surface area, quartzite and anorthosite were the most cytotoxic particle samples in both HBEC3-KT cells and THP-1 macrophages, surpassing the effects of the α-quartz reference sample.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While similar trends were observed, few of the apparent differences reached statistical significance in the combined culture of HBEC3-KT cells and THP-1 macrophages, compared with the corresponding monocultures. In line with previous studies from our group, differences in surface area could not fully explain the differences between the particle samples [ 47 , 48 ], suggesting that the differences in potency were due to other parameters, such as particle composition or surface reactivity. After correcting for differences in surface area, quartzite and anorthosite were the most cytotoxic particle samples in both HBEC3-KT cells and THP-1 macrophages, surpassing the effects of the α-quartz reference sample.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The high potency of the anorthosite and hornfels samples contradicts previous studies of stone- and mineral particles indicating that particle samples with high feldspar content have low cytotoxic and pro-inflammatory activity [ 45 48 , 50 ]. In the present study, the anorthosite, hornfels and rhomb porphyry samples all consisted primarily of feldspar minerals, but varied considerably in potency, suggesting that the total content of feldspar minerals is a poor indicator of stone-particle toxicity.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Even for a specific type of effects (i.e., inflammatory responses) the rank order of potency among different particle types may vary between different cell types and between in vitro cell culture tests and in vivo animal studies. This has been reported in a number of studies on ambient air PM as well as mineral particles and nanomaterials [105,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134]. These observations not only suggest the existence of a variety of triggering mechanisms for particle toxicity and that different particle characteristics may act as critical determinants for different toxicological effects, but also that triggering mechanisms may vary between different cell types and target organs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Rat macrophages show a stronger apoptotic response to smaller silica particles than larger particles. ( 56 ) The crystalline silica particles used in the present study ranged from 2 µm to 20 µm as assessed by in-air micro-PIXE analysis, and these sizes were similar to those used in previous reports. ( 16 , 57 ) Whether p62 expression can be affected by silica particle size has not been established.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%