2001
DOI: 10.1023/a:1013877316949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This variation was explained by an increase of nitrification rate with decreasing precipitation: when plants uptake nitrate as the sole source of N, high nitrification causes the ammonium-to-nitrate reaction to go further towards completion, which would decrease the isotope fractionation factor from ammonium to nitrate. Thus Δδ 15 N becomes small and nitrate becomes less deficient in 15 N. For an example of the third cause of Δδ 15 N variation, Fujiyoshi et al (2017) (Ozawa et al 2001;Fukuzawa et al 2006;Nagasaka et al 2015), whereas N loss due to leaching is negligible in taiga forests in northern Mongolia (Shugalei and Vedrova 2004). We hypothesize that a difference in soil N availability in the two regions influenced by climate leads to a difference in Δδ 15 N, because a difference in soil N availability is expected to link with a difference in the processes which causes Δδ 15 N variation from the previous studies above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variation was explained by an increase of nitrification rate with decreasing precipitation: when plants uptake nitrate as the sole source of N, high nitrification causes the ammonium-to-nitrate reaction to go further towards completion, which would decrease the isotope fractionation factor from ammonium to nitrate. Thus Δδ 15 N becomes small and nitrate becomes less deficient in 15 N. For an example of the third cause of Δδ 15 N variation, Fujiyoshi et al (2017) (Ozawa et al 2001;Fukuzawa et al 2006;Nagasaka et al 2015), whereas N loss due to leaching is negligible in taiga forests in northern Mongolia (Shugalei and Vedrova 2004). We hypothesize that a difference in soil N availability in the two regions influenced by climate leads to a difference in Δδ 15 N, because a difference in soil N availability is expected to link with a difference in the processes which causes Δδ 15 N variation from the previous studies above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%