2003
DOI: 10.1023/a:1024689217801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ideology of 'polyglot nationalism' or 'lived multilingualism' was prevalent in Vojvodina, as in all (post)Habsburg lands, until the 1950s, allowing for locally oriented reciprocal bi-/multilingualism without conflicting with national identity (Gal, 2011;Schjerve-Rindler and Vetter, 2007;Krel and Mandić, 2016). However, with the rise of monolingual nationalism, this ideology was suppressed, implying that minority speakers should be multilingual while majority speakers are not expected to be (Annamalai, 2003;Mandić and Rácz, 2023).…”
Section: Language Ideologies Minority Identities and Multilingual Dyn...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ideology of 'polyglot nationalism' or 'lived multilingualism' was prevalent in Vojvodina, as in all (post)Habsburg lands, until the 1950s, allowing for locally oriented reciprocal bi-/multilingualism without conflicting with national identity (Gal, 2011;Schjerve-Rindler and Vetter, 2007;Krel and Mandić, 2016). However, with the rise of monolingual nationalism, this ideology was suppressed, implying that minority speakers should be multilingual while majority speakers are not expected to be (Annamalai, 2003;Mandić and Rácz, 2023).…”
Section: Language Ideologies Minority Identities and Multilingual Dyn...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, given the politically charged debate around the TLF, it is no surprise that policy documents-with one notable exception (NCERT, 2006)-have tended to avoid discussing the scope of using multiple languages in the classroom, especially as MOIs. While this may have been a deliberate attempt to balance political ambitions of state and the central governments, it has paved the way for a subtle emphasis on dominant languages as MOIs (either the main state language or English) and the neglect of minority language speakers' linguistic repertoires (Annamalai, 2003).…”
Section: Current Issues In Language Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%