2014
DOI: 10.1017/s0025557200008299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

98.32 Triangles with two angles in the ratio 1:2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later Oppenheim, together with Daykin, explicitly characterized primitive integer triples for all p : q families, it seems fair to call them the Oppenheim triples. Their result was published back in 1967 [6], but special cases and related results were rediscovered later multiple times, see [2,3,7,11,13,15,16,17,21,24]. However, almost all attention went to the Oppenheim triples, while the "Pythagorean theorems", and algebro-geometric connections, were largely overlooked.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later Oppenheim, together with Daykin, explicitly characterized primitive integer triples for all p : q families, it seems fair to call them the Oppenheim triples. Their result was published back in 1967 [6], but special cases and related results were rediscovered later multiple times, see [2,3,7,11,13,15,16,17,21,24]. However, almost all attention went to the Oppenheim triples, while the "Pythagorean theorems", and algebro-geometric connections, were largely overlooked.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later Oppenheim, together with Daykin, explicitly characterized primitive integer triples for all p : q families, it seems fair to call them the Oppenheim triples. Their result was published in the Monthly back in 1967 [6], but special cases and related results were rediscovered later multiple times, see [2,3,7,11,13,15,16,17,21,24]. However, almost all attention went to the Oppenheim triples, while the "Pythagorean theorems", and algebrogeometric connections, were largely overlooked.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%