2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.03.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

97P Is continuing CDK4-6 inhibitor therapy safe during the COVID-19 pandemic? A UK cancer centre experience

Abstract: lectures and ad boards paid to institute: AbbVie; Honoraria (institution), honoraria for lectures and ad boards paid to institute: Celgene; Honoraria (institution), honorarium for lectures paid to institute: PriME/Medscape; Honoraria (self), lecture: Chugai; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), honoraria paid to institute: Daiichi Sankyo; Honoraria (institution), honorarium for ad boards paid to institute: Lilly; Honoraria (institution), advisor honorarium paid to institute: BMS; Honoraria (institution),… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies have suggested that CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment could impair patients’ immune responses, 29 , 30 while others have suggested that CDK4/6 inhibitor use is safe during the pandemic. 31 , 32 Recently, Zagouri and colleagues conducted a study of 21 patients with breast cancer on CDK4/6 inhibitors and demonstrated that these patients had a similar immune response as healthy controls. 33 In our study, we obtained similar results with an expanded patient cohort ( N = 64).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have suggested that CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment could impair patients’ immune responses, 29 , 30 while others have suggested that CDK4/6 inhibitor use is safe during the pandemic. 31 , 32 Recently, Zagouri and colleagues conducted a study of 21 patients with breast cancer on CDK4/6 inhibitors and demonstrated that these patients had a similar immune response as healthy controls. 33 In our study, we obtained similar results with an expanded patient cohort ( N = 64).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%