Language MOOCs: Providing Learning, Transcending Boundaries 2014
DOI: 10.2478/9783110420067.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

9 Teaching Pronunciation and Comprehensibility in a Language MOOC

Abstract: This chapter reports on a study comparing the gains in comprehensibility of students enrolled in a traditional face-to-face (F2F) pronunciation course with those enrolled in a Language MOOC (LMOOC). The study analyzes potential correlations between types of feedback and pronunciation gains. The two courses followed a similar structure and had comparable goals, but differed crucially in the types and amount of feedback provided to learners. Students produced a sample of controlled speech at the beginning and th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(21 reference statements)
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with Rubio (2014), the data analysed indicates that LMOOC learners have positive attitudes towards this type of (spoken) language learning environment. By the end of the course, participants present higher self-efficacy beliefs in terms of speaking competence.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In line with Rubio (2014), the data analysed indicates that LMOOC learners have positive attitudes towards this type of (spoken) language learning environment. By the end of the course, participants present higher self-efficacy beliefs in terms of speaking competence.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Colvin et al [ 35 ] compared learning gains measured in their MOOC with learning gains in traditional settings; they found evidence of learning in the MOOC, in which scores were slightly higher than typical for a comparable lecture-based course but significantly lower than those seen in other courses with an “interactive engagement” component. In a finding that appears counter to the above, Rubio [ 38 ] found that improvement in language comprehensibility was greater in a MOOC compared to a face-to-face course. Finally, in their review, Rowe et al [ 17 ] looked specifically at the effectiveness of MOOCs in health professions education; they concluded that it cannot be said that MOOCs “enhance student learning” despite the proliferation of MOOCs and the “hype” about their potential.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We found several examples of skill outcomes, including self-assessed preparedness (readiness for online education) [ 37 ] and improvement in Spanish language pronunciation and comprehensibility measured by pre-MOOC and post-MOOC assessments [ 38 ]. Further, participants in a library and information science MOOC were asked “What did you gain most from taking part in the MOOC?” Their responses included “Students gained new technological skills through their learning experience ” [ 39 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the LMOOC also had some theoretical implications on the dichotomy between implicit and explicit learning. As suggested in many works such as Rossetti and Revonsuo (2000), Sun, Slusarz and Terry (2005), or Latinjak (2014), among others, the combination of the two approaches is highly beneficial for students of foreign languages, and in particular of pronunciation (see Rubio 2014). In the regular university courses, English pronunciation is mainly taught following a formal, explicit approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%