2022
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01883-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

9 months of delamanid, linezolid, levofloxacin, and pyrazinamide versus conventional therapy for treatment of fluoroquinolone-sensitive multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-END): a multicentre, randomised, open-label phase 2/3 non-inferiority trial in South Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sample size ranged between 20 and 688 participants. Six studies were randomized clinical trials [22] , [24] , [25] , [26] , [28] , [29] , one non-randomized clinical trial [23] , and three were cohort studies [27] , [30] , [31] . ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample size ranged between 20 and 688 participants. Six studies were randomized clinical trials [22] , [24] , [25] , [26] , [28] , [29] , one non-randomized clinical trial [23] , and three were cohort studies [27] , [30] , [31] . ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, NExT intervention arm participants were 2.2 times more likely to experience favorable outcomes at 24 months than participants receiving the 9-month WHO-approved injectable-based regimen [51% (25/49) versus 22.7% (10/44); RR 2.2 (1.2–4.1); p = 0.006]. Surprisingly, results of the recent Korean MDR-END study [ 26 , 27 ] demonstrated that a new all-oral 9-month regimen consisting of DLM, LZD, LFX, and PZA was non-inferior to the conventional 20- to 24-month regimen in participants with FQ-sensitive MDR-TB, thus paving the way for investigations of additional SCR regimens incorporating DLM or combinations of BDQ with DLM. Additionally, a cost-effectiveness sub-study of PROSPECT is currently underway to generate cost data for BDQ-containing SCRs and SCRs without BDQ that will enable cost comparisons to be made between the two regimens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Moreover, the control group performance, 80.7% favorable outcome, was better than that reported in other recent studies. 3,4,[24][25][26] That non-inferiority could be established against this improved standard-and ruled out for 9DCLLfxZ at 78.8% favorable outcomes-provides confidence in the efficacy of the new regimens. High retention of participantsincluding in the control group-and completeness of study data indicate high-quality implementation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%