Treatise on Geomorphology 2013
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-374739-6.00234-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

9.9 Suspended Load

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This relationship makes sense as CPOM generally has a low density and is therefore easily entrained by flow at a wide range of velocities. The greater mass of CPOM at 0.6 depth compared to the surface may reflect a decrease in CPOM concentration with distance from the bed, analogous to that commonly observed in suspended sediment (Kuhnle, 2013). The difference in suspended CPOM mass with depth may also reflect experimental design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This relationship makes sense as CPOM generally has a low density and is therefore easily entrained by flow at a wide range of velocities. The greater mass of CPOM at 0.6 depth compared to the surface may reflect a decrease in CPOM concentration with distance from the bed, analogous to that commonly observed in suspended sediment (Kuhnle, 2013). The difference in suspended CPOM mass with depth may also reflect experimental design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The SSC (g l −1 ) indicates the average sediment mass that each unit of river water transports in the water column at a given time, so it reflects well the upstream erosive processes, such as storms (Tramblay et al., 2008), earthquakes (Tolorza et al., 2019), landslides (Vergara et al., 2022) and snow and ice melt (Mao & Carrillo, 2017). Suspended sediment is usually classified into particles greater than 65 μm, that can come from river bed and their transport depends on stream velocity, and particles smaller than 65 μm, that have an insignificant presence in river bed and their transport is almost independent of stream velocity (they are deposited in lakes and reservoirs where water velocity is low, i.e., 0.15–0.2 m s −1 ; Basile, 2018; Kuhnle, 2013). The latter fraction of suspended sediment is originated from river banks, hillslopes and glacier deposits (correspond to the largest fraction of the glacier‐deposited sediment, known as till).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The particle size distribution curves of suspended sediment were then compared with that of channel bed materials to separate wash and bed material loads. Three criteria of hydraulic engineers (Woo et al 1986;Kuhnle 2013), Einstein method (Einstein 1950;Julien 2009) and lower limit of sediment particles in channel material (Poplawski et al 1989) were used for the sediment load separation. In hydraulic and sediment transport engineering, the diameter limit of 63 microns (boundary between sand and silt) was considered as border between wash load and bed material load (Woo et al 1986;Kuhnle 2013).…”
Section: Data Analyses and Separation Of Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three criteria of hydraulic engineers (Woo et al 1986;Kuhnle 2013), Einstein method (Einstein 1950;Julien 2009) and lower limit of sediment particles in channel material (Poplawski et al 1989) were used for the sediment load separation. In hydraulic and sediment transport engineering, the diameter limit of 63 microns (boundary between sand and silt) was considered as border between wash load and bed material load (Woo et al 1986;Kuhnle 2013). In other words, the sediment particles larger than 63 microns in diameter were supposed as bed material load and particles smaller than 63 microns were considered as wash load.…”
Section: Data Analyses and Separation Of Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%