2020
DOI: 10.3390/cancers12061577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

8th Edition Tumor, Node, and Metastasis T-Stage Prognosis Discrepancies: Solid Component Diameter Predicts Prognosis Better than Invasive Component Diameter

Abstract: The biggest change in the 8th edition of the tumor, lymph node, and metastasis (TNM) classification is the recommendation of the solid component diameter and invasive size for determining the clinical and pathological T-factor, respectively. Here, we validated new proposals for the Lung Cancer TNM classification’s revision and compared clinical and pathological T-stages. We retrospectively analyzed 177 cases of non-small cell lung cancers without lymph node metastasis, and involving complete resection, that oc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(37 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ahn et al reported that the kappa values for agreement between clinical T-stage and pathological T-stage were 0.53–0.69 10 . In the present study, the kappa values for agreement between clinical T stage determined by virtual TSCT and the pathological T stage was 0.59 in both observers, which was consistent with the results of Ahn et al Interestingly, in the article by Funai et al, clinical T-stage based on TSCT was more correlated with the postoperative recurrence than with the pathological T-stage based on the invasive size 21 . Therefore, we speculate that the clinical T-stage measured by virtual TSCT may also be correlated with prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ahn et al reported that the kappa values for agreement between clinical T-stage and pathological T-stage were 0.53–0.69 10 . In the present study, the kappa values for agreement between clinical T stage determined by virtual TSCT and the pathological T stage was 0.59 in both observers, which was consistent with the results of Ahn et al Interestingly, in the article by Funai et al, clinical T-stage based on TSCT was more correlated with the postoperative recurrence than with the pathological T-stage based on the invasive size 21 . Therefore, we speculate that the clinical T-stage measured by virtual TSCT may also be correlated with prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, it was comparable to the clinical T stage determined by real TSCT. Several previous studies have reported a difference between clinical TNM stages and pathological stages 7 , 10 , 15 , 21 . Ahn et al reported that the kappa values for agreement between clinical T-stage and pathological T-stage were 0.53–0.69 10 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…A total of 84 patients (58 male and 26 female) with lung cancer with a mean age of 60.78 years (range, 37–87) were enrolled in the present study. According to the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging Project ( 29 ), various clinical stages were present among the enrolled patients, including three cases at stage I, five cases at stage III and 76 cases at stage IV. Detailed clinical characteristics of the patients are presented in Table I .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a recent study proposed that the clinical T category may be a better prognostic indicator than the pathological T category. 32 Second, variants of invasive adenocarcinoma were not included (e.g., invasive mucinous, colloid, fetal, and enteric adenocarcinoma). 3 In addition, the latest reported histologic subtypes were not assessed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, a recent study reported that the solid portion size on CT demonstrated a better prognostic correlation than the invasive component size. 32 The longest diameter of the solid portion was measured on the lung window setting (window width, 1500 HU; level, -700 HU). All measurements were performed in the axial plane using an electronic caliper by one of the two trained radiology technicians (either M.L.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%